<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RAM Concept Foundations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/233877/ram-concept-foundations</link><description>Does RAM Concept have a cutoff for what it considers a &amp;quot;thick&amp;quot; mat foundation when it designs required reinforcement? I was working on a 5x5x2 spread footing design (no loads) and the preset program minimum reinforcement requirements design rule forces</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: RAM Concept Foundations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/725894?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 16:44:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3073912a-0691-47c0-98cb-b4a4f498e0a8</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;No, we don&amp;#39;t change any logic based on the slab thickness. Some of the things that affect min rebar design besides the 0.0018 ratio are partial development circumstances and max bar spacing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>