Hello Team,
While using AISC 360-16 in STAAD Pro Connect edition Update 10 beam results show wrong failing criteria. for example a beam which is within allowable slenderness limit shows failure criteria as 'slenderness' whereas the unity ratio shown is for another design check clause. please advise a work around for this.
Please attach the model.
DWTS_T29.std Please find attached model
Yes, it seems that critical clause for member 265 is incorrectly reported as Slenderness instead of H1-1a. I have reported this issue to the development team (Help Ticket #981789) in order to review this possible defect and fix it in the upcoming STAAD.Pro versions. Thank you for bringing this issue into our attention and we apologize for the inconveniences.
Just to update you - this issue was acknowledged as a Bug and should be fixed in the upcoming STAAD.Pro CE V22 Update 12. As of now, please check the results in the Output file.
I am glad to inform that the issue which was reported by you is now fixed in the new STAAD.Pro 2023 release, which can be downloaded from here: softwaredownloads.bentley.com/.../1562
The Release Notes can be found here: communities.bentley.com/.../new-release---staad-pro-2023
Answer Verified By: Udhaya Kumar Manickavasagam