AISC 360-16 Design results

Question

Hello Team, 
 While using AISC 360-16 in STAAD Pro Connect edition Update 10 beam results show wrong failing criteria. for example a beam which is within allowable slenderness limit shows failure criteria as 'slenderness' whereas the unity ratio shown is for another design check clause. please advise a work around for this.

Modestas · Accepted Answer

I am glad to inform that the issue which was reported by you is now fixed in the new STAAD.Pro 2023 release, which can be downloaded from here: softwaredownloads.bentley.com/.../1562 
 The Release Notes can be found here: communities.bentley.com/.../new-release---staad-pro-2023

Modestas · Answer

Yes, it seems that critical clause for member 265 is incorrectly reported as Slenderness instead of H1-1a. I have reported this issue to the development team (Help Ticket #981789) in order to review this possible defect and fix it in the upcoming STAAD.Pro versions. Thank you for bringing this issue into our attention and we apologize for the inconveniences.

Modestas · Answer

Just to update you - this issue was acknowledged as a Bug and should be fixed in the upcoming STAAD.Pro CE V22 Update 12. As of now, please check the results in the Output file.