<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What is the best way to model beam elements of different depths flush at the top, including plate elements?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/237538/what-is-the-best-way-to-model-beam-elements-of-different-depths-flush-at-the-top-including-plate-elements</link><description>Hello. Please go through attached PowerPoint and then the below discussion will make more sense. I am using STAAD version 20.07.11.70. 
 
 The main problem is: when modelling decks or bulkheads which include offset beam elements and plates attached to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator></channel></rss>