<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Axial force in beam RAM frame</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/244712/axial-force-in-beam-ram-frame</link><description>Hi, 
 I have modeled knee braced frame as shown in imahe below. I am looking at the controlling axial load using member force envelope graphical mode. I see the values for min = -16.54 and max 3.21k. Therefore min value should control. However, when I</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Axial force in beam RAM frame</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/763756?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 16:10:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b3d30fae-4459-48c9-9962-5e022a2d1b5c</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Presumably because 3.2 kips of compression along with the bending moments, unbraced length and Cb factor in the center section yields a higher interaction ratio than 16.5 kips of tension in the shorter segment. You can isolate a single load combination in the Ram Frame Steel mode and recheck the report if needed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>