<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Control/Dependent or Rigid Link for Walls</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/247941/control-dependent-or-rigid-link-for-walls</link><description>Hi, 
 I am using the Physical Modeller of STAAD Pro Connect Edition V22 Update 12. 
 I have a wall that is shaped as follows. It is thicker on 1 part than the other. 
 
 I have modeled the different thicknesses of the wall as 2 separate surfaces at the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Control/Dependent or Rigid Link for Walls</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/775623?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 09:16:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:f0f3c2d5-66d2-4d7f-85c0-f9f349e98f25</guid><dc:creator>Modestas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a valid modeling approach and both methods (control/dependent) or rigid link should give the same results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>