Beam Shear Reinforcement in RAM Concept

I'm using RAM concept to analyze a pan joist system being supported by mild & post-tensioned beams. When looking at the shear reinforcement, the program is providing many more stirrups than expected. The shear demand (Figure 1) shows that the capacity (Figure 2) is not exceeded but, the shear reinforcement suggests otherwise (Figure 3). I'm unclear on why this is occurring any guidance would be helpful.
Also, at the second joist from the top, the program is changing the stirrup spacing, this creates a spike in the capacity at this location, I am unclear why it would need to change spacing at this location as the applied shear does not warrant this.
Some additional information on the beam in the figures below, the 48Wx21DP exterior beam running north-south in the figures below is a mild beam being supported in the south by a column above & below and being supported in the north by a cantilevered beam.
Figure 1: Maximum/Minimum Shear Demand
Figure 2: Maximum/Minimum Shear Capacity
Figure 3: Shear Reinforcement

Parents Reply
  • To add some additional information. We have set the design strips for all beams and joist members to be "Code T-Beam" with "T or L" cross-sectional trimming.  For the shear design, we have it set to "shear" only instead of "Shear and torsion".  See below for additional information on our design strips.

    When we do an audit of one of the sections along the beam length the shear capacity shown from concrete implies that stirrups will not be required because the applied shear is 6.9k and it is listing the Vu threshold for minimum shear reinforcing as 52.98k. So we are not sure why there are stirrups provided at this location.


Children