Loads disappear

Could someone please explain why the floor loads "disappear" after I added a two ton monorail.  Please look at members 32 and 34 of the Ex Floor_Calc and members 32 33 34 of the Monorail_Calc STAAD documents attached.

EX Floor_Calc

STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 06-Nov-09
JOB NAME 2 TON RECLAIM MONORAIL
JOB CLIENT
ENGINEER NAME CKM
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT FEET KIP
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 14 0 0; 3 0 0 14; 4 14 0 14; 5 0 0 28; 6 14 0 28; 11 0 16.33 0;
12 14 16.33 0; 13 0 16.33 14; 14 14 16.33 14; 15 0 16.33 28; 16 14 16.33 28;
17 2.625 16.33 0; 18 5.25 16.33 0; 19 8.75 16.33 0; 20 11.375 16.33 0;
22 2.625 16.33 14; 23 5.25 16.33 14; 24 7 16.33 14; 25 8.75 16.33 14;
26 11.375 16.33 14; 27 0 16.33 18.67; 29 7 16.33 18.67; 30 14 16.33 18.67;
31 0 16.33 23.34; 32 14 16.33 23.34; 41 0 29 0; 42 14 29 0; 43 0 29 14;
44 14 29 14; 45 0 29 28; 46 14 29 28; 51 7 8.17 28;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 11; 2 11 41; 3 2 12; 4 12 42; 5 3 13; 6 13 43; 7 4 14; 8 14 44; 9 5 15;
10 15 45; 11 6 16; 12 16 46; 20 11 17; 21 17 18; 22 18 19; 23 19 20; 24 20 12;
25 13 22; 26 22 23; 27 23 24; 28 24 25; 29 25 26; 30 26 14; 32 27 29; 34 29 30;
35 31 32; 36 15 16; 40 11 13; 41 13 27; 42 27 31; 43 31 15; 44 17 22; 46 18 23;
47 24 29; 48 19 25; 49 20 26; 50 12 14; 51 14 30; 52 30 32; 53 32 16; 71 5 51;
72 51 16; 73 6 51; 74 51 15;
START USER TABLE
TABLE 1
UNIT INCHES KIP
WIDE FLANGE
W14X103
30.3 14.25 0.495 14.575 0.813 1170 420 6.02 7.05375 23.6989
W10X21
6.2 9.9 0.24 5.75 0.34 107 10.8 0.21 2.376 3.91
W8X17
5.01 8 0.23 5.25 0.308 56.6 7.44 0.147 1.84 3.234
END
UNIT FEET KIP
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC STEEL
E 4.176e+006
POISSON 0.3
DENSITY 0.489024
ALPHA 6e-006
DAMP 0.03
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
9 TO 12 TABLE ST W8X31
5 6 TABLE ST W12X58
20 TO 30 TABLE ST W16X26
32 34 35 44 46 48 49 TABLE ST W8X13
71 TO 74 TABLE ST L30304
47 TABLE ST W6X15
7 8 TABLE ST W12X72
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
1 TO 4 UPTABLE 1 W14X103
41 TO 43 51 TO 53 UPTABLE 1 W10X21
36 40 50 UPTABLE 1 W8X17
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL STEEL ALL
SUPPORTS
1 TO 6 PINNED
41 TO 46 FIXED
MEMBER RELEASE
40 44 46 48 50 BOTH MX MY MZ
20 25 36 41 47 51 71 73 START MX MY MZ
24 30 35 36 43 53 72 74 END MX MY MZ
32 35 49 START MX MY
34 47 49 END MX MY
LOAD 1 SELFWEIGHT
SELFWEIGHT Y -1
LOAD 2 DEAD LOAD (50 PSF)
JOINT LOAD
17 20 FY -0.92
18 19 FY -0.46
27 30 TO 32 FY -1.63
LOAD 3 LIVE LOAD (125 PSF) SAME TRIB AREAS
JOINT LOAD
17 20 FY -2.3
18 19 FY -1.16
*LIVE LOAD = 75 PSF ELEVATED PLATFORMS IBC
27 30 TO 32 FY -2.45
LOAD 4 BRACING LOAD FROM DWG W-71-313-6
*AND LOADS FROM 175 TON BINS
MEMBER LOAD
72 CON X 11.4 10.75
JOINT LOAD
41 TO 44 FY -87.5
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE Dead  TITLE LOAD CASE 7
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.05 XRANGE 0 5.25  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.05 XRANGE 8.75 14  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.05 XRANGE 0 14  ZRANGE 14 28  GY
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Live  TITLE LOAD CASE 8
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.125 XRANGE 0 5.25  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.125 XRANGE 8.75 14  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.075 XRANGE 0 14  ZRANGE 14 28  GY
LOAD 7 MR ULTIMATE LOAD
MEMBER LOAD
32 CON GY -8.76 2.63
32 CON GZ -1.90 2.63
LOAD COMB 8 1.4D
1 1.4 2 1.4 4 1.0 5 1.4
LOAD COMB 9 1.2D + 1.6L + 1.07
1 1.2 2 1.2 5 1.4 3 1.6 4 1.0 6 1.6 7 1.0
PERFORM ANALYSIS
LOAD LIST 8 9
PARAMETER 1
CODE LRFD
*300/1.4 FOR SERVICE LOAD
DFF 214 ALL
*500/1.4 FOR SERVICE LOAD FOR MONORAIL
DJ1 11 MEMB 20 TO 24
DJ2 12 MEMB 20 TO 24
DJ1 13 MEMB 25 TO 30
DJ2 14 MEMB 25 TO 30
DJ1 13 MEMB 41 TO 43
DJ2 15 MEMB 41 TO 43
DJ1 14 MEMB 51 TO 53
DJ2 16 MEMB 51 TO 53
DJ1 27 MEMB 32 34
DJ2 30 MEMB 32 34
UNT 1 MEMB 20 TO 30 32 34 TO 36 40 TO 44 46 TO 53
CHECK CODE ALL
PRINT ANALYSIS RESULTS
FINISH

Monorail_Calc

STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 06-Nov-09
JOB NAME 2 TON RECLAIM MONORAIL
JOB CLIENT
ENGINEER NAME CKM
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT FEET KIP
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 14 0 0; 3 0 0 14; 4 14 0 14; 5 0 0 28; 6 14 0 28; 11 0 16.33 0;
12 14 16.33 0; 13 0 16.33 14; 14 14 16.33 14; 15 0 16.33 28; 16 14 16.33 28;
17 2.625 16.33 0; 18 5.25 16.33 0; 19 8.75 16.33 0; 20 11.375 16.33 0;
22 0 16.33 5.21; 23 2.625 16.33 5.21; 24 2.625 16.33 10.42; 25 2.625 16.33 14;
26 5.25 16.33 14; 27 7 16.33 14; 28 8.75 16.33 14; 29 11.375 16.33 14;
30 0 16.33 18.67; 31 2.625 16.33 18.67; 32 7 16.33 18.67; 33 14 16.33 18.67;
34 0 16.33 23.34; 35 14 16.33 23.34; 41 0 29 0; 42 14 29 0; 43 0 29 14;
44 14 29 14; 45 0 29 28; 46 14 29 28; 51 7 8.17 28; 101 2.625 12.42 10.42;
102 2.625 12.42 14; 103 2.625 12.42 18.67;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 11; 2 11 41; 3 2 12; 4 12 42; 5 3 13; 6 13 43; 7 4 14; 8 14 44; 9 5 15;
10 15 45; 11 6 16; 12 16 46; 20 11 17; 21 17 18; 22 18 19; 23 19 20; 24 20 12;
25 13 25; 26 25 26; 27 26 27; 28 27 28; 29 28 29; 30 29 14; 32 30 31; 33 31 32;
34 32 33; 35 34 35; 36 15 16; 41 11 22; 42 22 13; 43 13 30; 44 30 34; 45 34 15;
46 17 23; 47 23 24; 48 24 25; 49 18 26; 50 27 32; 51 19 28; 52 20 29; 53 12 14;
54 14 33; 55 33 35; 56 35 16; 71 5 51; 72 51 16; 73 6 51; 74 51 15; 101 24 101;
102 25 102; 103 31 103; 104 22 23; 201 101 102; 202 102 103;
START USER TABLE
TABLE 1
UNIT INCHES KIP
WIDE FLANGE
W14X103
30.3 14.25 0.495 14.575 0.813 1170 420 6.02 7.05375 23.6989
W10X21
6.2 9.9 0.24 5.75 0.34 107 10.8 0.21 2.376 3.91
W8X17
5.01 8 0.23 5.25 0.308 56.6 7.44 0.147 1.84 3.234
END
UNIT FEET KIP
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC STEEL
E 4.176e+006
POISSON 0.3
DENSITY 0.489024
ALPHA 6e-006
DAMP 0.03
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
9 TO 12 TABLE ST W8X31
5 6 TABLE ST W12X58
20 TO 30 TABLE ST W16X26
32 TO 35 46 TO 49 51 52 TABLE ST W8X13
71 TO 74 TABLE ST L30304
50 104 TABLE ST W6X15
7 8 TABLE ST W12X72
101 TO 103 TABLE ST W6X15
201 202 TABLE ST S12X31
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
1 TO 4 UPTABLE 1 W14X103
43 TO 45 54 TO 56 UPTABLE 1 W10X21
36 41 42 53 UPTABLE 1 W8X17
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL STEEL ALL
SUPPORTS
1 TO 6 PINNED
41 TO 46 FIXED
MEMBER RELEASE
42 49 51 53 BOTH MX MY MZ
20 25 36 43 46 50 54 71 73 104 START MX MY MZ
24 30 35 36 45 48 56 72 74 104 END MX MY MZ
32 35 52 START MX MY
34 50 52 END MX MY
*201 START MX
*202 END MX
*101 TO 103 START MY
LOAD 1 SELFWEIGHT
SELFWEIGHT Y -1
LOAD 2 DEAD LOAD (50 PSF)
*TRIB AREA 4.67' MEMB 32 TO 35
*TRIB AREA 2.33' MEMB 25 TO 30 36
*TRIB AREA 2.63' MEMB 40 44 45 49 50
*TRIB AREA 1.32' MEMB 46 48
JOINT LOAD
17 20 FY -0.92
18 19 FY -0.46
30 33 TO 35 FY -1.63
LOAD 3 LIVE LOAD (125 PSF) SAME TRIB AREAS
JOINT LOAD
17 20 FY -2.3
18 19 FY -1.16
*LIVE LOAD = 75 PSF ELEVATED PLATFORMS IBC
30 33 TO 35 FY -2.45
LOAD 4 BRACING LOAD FROM DWG W-71-313-6
*AND LOADS FROM 175 TON BINS
MEMBER LOAD
72 CON X 11.4 10.75
JOINT LOAD
41 TO 44 FY -87.5
LOAD 5 DL MR SHEAR
MEMBER LOAD
201 CON GY -0.63 0.25
201 CON GX 0.13 0.25
201 CON GZ 0.05 0.25
LOAD 6 LL MR SHEAR
MEMBER LOAD
201 CON GY -5 0.25
201 CON GX 1 0.25
201 CON GZ 0.4 0.25
LOAD 7 DL MR MID
MEMBER LOAD
202 CON GY -0.63
202 CON GX 0.13
202 CON GZ 0.05
LOAD 8 LL MR MID
MEMBER LOAD
202 CON GY -5
202 CON GX 1
202 CON GZ 0.4
LOAD 9 DL MR OTHER SHEAR
MEMBER LOAD
202 CON GY -0.63 4.5
202 CON GX 0.13 4.5
202 CON GZ 0.05 4.5
LOAD 10 LL MR OTHER SHEAR
MEMBER LOAD
202 CON GY -5 4.5
202 CON GX 1 4.5
202 CON GZ 0.4 4.5
LOAD 11 LOADTYPE Dead  TITLE LOAD CASE 7
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.05 XRANGE 0 5.25  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.05 XRANGE 8.75 14  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.05 XRANGE 0 14  ZRANGE 14 28  GY
LOAD 12 LOADTYPE Live  TITLE LOAD CASE 8
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.125 XRANGE 0 5.25  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.125 XRANGE 8.75 14  ZRANGE 0 14  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.075 XRANGE 0 7  ZRANGE 14 18.67  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.075 XRANGE 7 14  ZRANGE 14 18.67  GY
YRANGE 0 16.33 FLOAD -0.075 XRANGE 0 14  ZRANGE 18.67 28  GY
LOAD COMB 13 1.4D
1 1.4 2 1.4 4 1.0 11 1.4
LOAD COMB 14 1.2D + 1.6L MR SHEAR
1 1.2 2 1.2 3 1.6 4 1.0 11 1.2 5 1.2 6 1.6 12 1.6
LOAD COMB 15 1.2D + 1.6L MR MIDPOINT
1 1.2 2 1.2 3 1.6 4 1.0 11 1.2 7 1.2 8 1.6 12 1.6
LOAD COMB 16 1.2D + 1.6L MR OTHER SHEAR
1 1.2 2 1.2 3 1.6 4 1.0 11 1.2 9 1.2 10 1.6 12 1.6
PERFORM ANALYSIS
LOAD LIST 13 TO 16
PARAMETER 1
CODE LRFD
*300/1.4 FOR SERVICE LOAD
DFF 214 MEMB 1 TO 12 20 TO 30 32 TO 36 41 TO 56 71 TO 74 101 TO 104
*500/1.4 FOR SERVICE LOAD FOR MONORAIL
DFF 357 MEMB 201 202
DJ1 11 MEMB 20 TO 24
DJ2 12 MEMB 20 TO 24
DJ1 13 MEMB 25 TO 30
DJ2 14 MEMB 25 TO 30
DJ1 13 MEMB 43 TO 45
DJ2 15 MEMB 43 TO 45
DJ1 14 MEMB 54 TO 56
DJ2 16 MEMB 54 TO 56
DJ1 30 MEMB 32 TO 34
DJ2 33 MEMB 32 TO 34
DJ1 17 MEMB 46 TO 48
DJ2 25 MEMB 46 TO 48
DJ1 11 MEMB 41 42
DJ2 13 MEMB 41 42
UNT 1 MEMB 20 TO 30 32 TO 36 41 TO 56
CHECK CODE ALL
PRINT ANALYSIS RESULTS
FINISH

 Thanks.

Parents
  • The Modeling mode is showing the graphic depiction of the FLOOR load in both versions of your model.

    Are you able to see the load in Modeling mode?  If not, it could be an issue of scale, which you can adjust in the Diagrams dialog.

    Or are you describing an effect that you are seeing in analysis results?

    Chris

     



  • I'm wondering about the effect that I see in the analysis results.  I did a quick hand calc for a simple beam on the ex floor and came up with an internal moment that matched STAAD results.  When I add the monorail, the internal moment goes down, not up as expected.

    Thanks.

  • I'm not sure which load case you're referring to, so I picked the one that was named "LOAD CASE 8" in both models...just for clarity, that is LC 6 in EX Floor_Calc and it is LC 12 in Monorail_Calc.

    In that load case, you see a reduction in the moment applied to beams 32 and 34 in EX Floor_Calc (beams 32, 33 and 34 in Monorail_Calc) because of the stiffening effect of the underslung monorail support beam (the S12x31).  Since that two-span beam is modeled as continuous, it is resisting the tendency for beams 32, 33 and 34 to deflect downward.

    If this doesn't quite address your concern, please let me know exactly which load conditions you're comparing between the two different models, and I'll study those for you.

    I'd also like to offer you a general comment about defining ranges for FLOOR loads.  It is generally good practice to define the ranges slightly outboard of the nodal coordinates that define the perimeter members.  That was you minimize the potential for errors in the interpretation of your loads as a result of roundoff errors.

    Cheers,

    Chris



Reply
  • I'm not sure which load case you're referring to, so I picked the one that was named "LOAD CASE 8" in both models...just for clarity, that is LC 6 in EX Floor_Calc and it is LC 12 in Monorail_Calc.

    In that load case, you see a reduction in the moment applied to beams 32 and 34 in EX Floor_Calc (beams 32, 33 and 34 in Monorail_Calc) because of the stiffening effect of the underslung monorail support beam (the S12x31).  Since that two-span beam is modeled as continuous, it is resisting the tendency for beams 32, 33 and 34 to deflect downward.

    If this doesn't quite address your concern, please let me know exactly which load conditions you're comparing between the two different models, and I'll study those for you.

    I'd also like to offer you a general comment about defining ranges for FLOOR loads.  It is generally good practice to define the ranges slightly outboard of the nodal coordinates that define the perimeter members.  That was you minimize the potential for errors in the interpretation of your loads as a result of roundoff errors.

    Cheers,

    Chris



Children