<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Notional Loads on Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/76033/notional-loads-on-load-combinations</link><description>Hi, I have to take into account the NOTIONAL LOADS into my Analysis so I need to include their effects in the Load Combinations, so the question is: 
 Which is the correct way to state them?, 1) As a Basic Load, and then called them from Load Combinations</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Notional Loads on Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/637662?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 10:04:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e6cb3b2f-acfa-4786-8dec-3fb998d5c54d</guid><dc:creator>yu chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;how about notional load in wind load case 3, in which the orthogonal direction need to be considered 0.75*WINDX+0,75 WINDZ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Notional Loads on Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/637661?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 10:04:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:84202491-35e3-41ec-bab6-92db14ebc225</guid><dc:creator>yu chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;how about notional load applied in wind load cas3, in which the orthogonal wind need to be considered together, 0,75windX+0,75WINDZ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Notional Loads on Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/637660?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 10:03:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7f1e090c-47ef-4766-b449-e6a482827dca</guid><dc:creator>yu chen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;how about notional load in wind load case 3, in which the orthogonal direction need to be considered 0.75*WINDX+0,75 WINDZ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Notional Loads on Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/206106?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:10:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c44f397f-ff67-4c6c-be8f-a0c87c75e9b7</guid><dc:creator>Kris Sathia</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Both methods are OK in the current version (20.07.08.20)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Notional Loads on Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/205919?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:02:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1345124e-c3c4-4b89-aa2d-45a6bdf975d6</guid><dc:creator>caenleve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does somebody have any suggestion?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Notional Loads on Load Combinations</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/205917?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:01:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d2757dfc-6f6f-4b75-b218-7b48183f18e8</guid><dc:creator>caenleve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does somebody have any suggestion?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>