QUESTION 1:
I am designing a 12-storey building using Staad Pro v8i. I have moment frames going in both East-West and North-South directions. The frames in the E-W direction are to be designed per the strong axis due to wind load considerations. How do I design the frame in the N-S direction so that Staad Pro designs this and checks for stresses and other criteria in the minor axis of the column?
I know that there is an option of "Axis" in the design parameters' but this is just for single angles and not "W" columns.
QUESTION 2:
While designing the frames for this building; I am performing an initial "Check Code" to check for the sections that I have designed using ENERCALC. After this; I am asking Staad to design the same sections using AISC 1989 ASD code. Finally I am asking Staad to check the design it suggested. In this case; Staad is failing the same beams/columns that it just designed in the previous parameter? Can you let me know what is going on here?
QUESTION 3:
I am adding bracing to the moment frame in this building. These are added as 4'x4' knee braces at the ceiling level; and specified as truss members. While performing seismic analysis; Staad is failing these bracing and showing the joints as unstable. Why is it failing these joints? Also, it is performing checks per equation H1-1, H1-2 and H2-1 on these members. I have specified these as truss members and hence they should not take any moment. Staad is still checking these for the above equations. Can you let me know the reason for this failure?
Thank you.
Oh sorry; I thought there were other errors. I was able to break the beams at the brace points and get it to work.
Thank you for all your help.
After properly segmenting the beams and columns at the brace intersection points, I no longer see any errors when running the file. If you are still having an issue after that you might want to post the output file or cite the errors.
Hi
Can you explain the errors that you mentioned earlier?
My understanding was this would reduce the length/height of the beam/column accordingly; and hence I had not gone with this approach. I will correct this in the analysis.
Can you expand on the other errors in the analysis? Please also suggest corrections for these errors.
1. I recommend a space frame if you are really dealing with corner columns in frames for both directions.
2. Check out the SELECT OPTIMIZED command.
3. If you look at the Post Processing screen you'll see the knee braces flying off into space. This happens because the beams and columns are bypassing the nodes leaving the braces unsupported. As such the whole analysis is not right.
There are a number of ways to split the beams where the braces intersect. I used Geometry - Break Beams at Selected nodes (with all of the beams, columns, braces and nodes on the right selected).
Answer Verified By: Gopalraj Manitraj