<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Direct Analysis Method</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/97674/direct-analysis-method</link><description>Hi! 
 I am new with Direct Analysis Method so I decided to run an example of a frame we saw in class with Staad Pro. The example in class was developed by a linear first order analysis with increased moments factors B1 and B2. Unfortunately, after running</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Direct Analysis Method</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/287761?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:36:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bcc2958a-2734-4c99-afc4-189da8498cf7</guid><dc:creator>Biswatosh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The AISC code suggests the Direct Analysis to be performed by either magnifying the moments reported by the first order analysis (B1 - B2 method ) or by performing the rigorous iterative second order analysis( P-Delta Analysis).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first approach is an approximate method, whereas the second one is an exact method based on &amp;nbsp;second order iterative process. So, one can expect certain degree of deviation of the results generated by both methods.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, you have mentioned that &amp;nbsp;you are trying to see the statics check result for the combination case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, it is not suggested to use the &amp;quot;Load Combination&amp;quot; for any non-linear analysis, so for the Direct analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of Load combination, try using the &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Repeat Load&amp;quot; case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding the second part of your query, the idea is to manually reduce the the axial and flexural stiffness to account for the material non-linearity as specified by the DAM. So, you can either use the cracked section factor to reduce the A and I value or reduce the E value while performing the P-Delta analysis. But, there is no such way available in Staad to use one value of E for analysts and another E value for design operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more detail on Direct Analysis Method, please refer to the following link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../10606.direct-analysis-and-its-implentation-in-staad-pro.aspx&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Direct Analysis Method</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/287760?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:35:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e91058f1-3b64-4db3-b179-279adf64a4b5</guid><dc:creator>Biswatosh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The AISC code suggests the Direct Analysis to be performed by either magnifying the moments reported by the first order analysis (B1 - B2 method ) or by performing the rigorous iterative second order analysis( P-Delta Analysis).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first approach is an approximate method, whereas the second one is an exact method based on &amp;nbsp;second order iterative process. So, one can expect certain degree of deviation of the results generated by both methods.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, you have mentioned that &amp;nbsp;you are trying to see the statics check result for the combination case. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, it is not suggested to use the &amp;quot;Load Combination&amp;quot; for any non-linear analysis, so for the Direct analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of Load combination, try using the &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Repeat Load&amp;quot; case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding the second part of your query, the idea is to manually reduce the the axial and flexural stiffness to account for the material non-linearity as specified by the DAM. So, you can either use the cracked section factor to reduce the A and I value or reduce the E value while performing the P-Delta analysis. But, there is no such way available in Staad to use one value of E for analysts and another E value for design operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more detail on Direct Analysis Method, please refer to the following link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/10606.direct-analysis-and-its-implentation-in-staad-pro.aspx"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../10606.direct-analysis-and-its-implentation-in-staad-pro.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>