Bentley Communities
Bentley Communities
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
RAM | STAAD | ADINA
  • Product Communities
RAM | STAAD | ADINA
RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki Pushover Analysis of Steel Structure using STAAD (TN)
    • Sign In
    • -RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki
      • +ADINA
      • +iTwin Analytical Synchronizer_
      • +Structural Analysis Support Solutions
      • +RAM Concept
      • +RAM Connection
      • +RAM Elements
      • +RAM SBeam
      • +RAM Structural System
      • -STAAD.Pro
        • +(+) Revision History
        • -(+) STAAD.Pro Support Solutions
          • +STAAD.Pro General [FAQ]
          • +STAAD.Pro Verification Documents
          • STAAD.Pro Safety Related Features
          • +STAAD.Pro Developing The Model [FAQ]
          • +STAAD.Pro Import/Export [FAQ]
          • +STAAD.Pro Installation/Licensing Solutions
          • +STAAD.Pro Miscellaneous Solutions
          • +STAAD.Pro Miscellaneous [FAQ]
          • +STAAD.Pro Postprocessing FAQ's
          • +STAAD.Pro Postprocessing Solutions
          • -STAAD.Pro TechNotes [TN]
            • Box Culvert Analysis in Staad.pro
            • Computation of Center Of Rigidity (CR)
            • Computation of Story Stiffness
            • Consideration of Global Analysis (clause 5.2) and Member Imperfections (clause 5.3) to EN 1993-1-1:2005 in STAAD.Pro
            • DIRECT ANALYSIS AND ITS IMPLENTATION IN STAAD.PRO
            • Discussion on Seismic Detailing Concept of RC Structures (IS:13920-1993)
            • Floor Response Spectrum
            • HOW TO DEFINE MULTIPLE RIGID DIAPHRAGM AT SAME Y LEVEL
            • IS:1893 (Part-I)-2002 Response Spectrum Philosophy
            • Limitations of the curved beams in STAAD.Pro ( TN )
            • Magnifying or Scaling down a model
            • Member End Forces and Joint Equlibrium
            • Member Tension And Combination Load Cases [TN]
            • Pushover Analysis of Steel Structure using STAAD (TN)
            • Reference Loads An Introduction
            • Specifying the selfweight of surface entities as a load item in a load case
            • STAAD PLANE - what are the assumptions
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 implementation: Calculation of Torsional Capacities of Cross Sections as per SCI P057
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Code Check for Torsion
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Elastic Verification of Cross Sectional Resistance
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Example 10 verification as per SCI P364
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Example 11 verification as per SCI P364
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Example 2 verification as per SCI P364
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Example 3 verification as per SCI P364
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Example 4 verification as per SCI P364
            • STAAD.Pro EN 1993-1-1:2005 Implementation: Example 9 verification as per SCI P364
            • STAAD.Pro Wall Analysis For Dams [TN]
            • Tension/Compression Only Spring Support
            • +Tips for Using RAM Connection within STAAD.Pro [TN].
            • Torsion consideration in IS: 1893-2002 seismic analysis
            • Understanding the EN 1993-1-1:2005 Design Parameters
            • “Missing Mass” in Dynamic Analysis
          • +(+) Analytical Modeling workflow
          • +(+) Connection Design workflow
          • +(+) Physical Modeling workflow
          • +(+) Postprocessing workflow
          • +(+) Steel AutoDrafter worfklow
        • +(+) STAAD.Pro Download/Installation/Security/Performance
        • +(+) STAAD.Pro Known Issues
        • +(+) STAAD.Pro Licensing Solutions
        • +(+) STAAD.Pro Webinars/Videos//Events
      • +STAAD Foundation Advanced
      • +STAAD Advanced Concrete Design (RCDC)
      • +STAAD.building
      • +STAAD RCDC FE
      • +Scenario Services
      • +STAAD.offshore
      • +Limcon
      • +Microstran
      • +MStower
      • +Structural Dashboard
      • +Structural WorkSuite
    • +RAM | STAAD Learning Resources
    • Simplifications to Bentley's Engineering Simulation Software Licenses

     
     Questions about this article, topic, or product? Click here. 

    Pushover Analysis of Steel Structure using STAAD (TN)

       
      Applies To 
       
      Product(s): STAAD.Pro
      Version(s): All
      Environment:  N/A
      Area:  Pushover Analysis of Steel Structure using STAAD
      Subarea:  N/A
      Original Author: Bentley Technical Support Group
       
     
    Pushover Analysis
    of
    Steel Structure using STAAD 
     By
     
    Bentley Systems
    Mr. Kalavagunta Sreedhar
     
                                                                Definition
    Pushover Analysis option will allow engineers to perform pushover analysis as per FEMA 356 : 2000 and ATC 40. Pushover analysis is a static, nonlinear procedure using simplified nonlinear technique to estimate seismic structural deformations. It is an incremental static analysis used to determine the force-displacement relationship, or the capacity curve, for a structure or structural element.
     

    The analysis involves applying horizontal loads, in a prescribed pattern, to the structure incrementally, i.e. pushing the structure and plotting the total applied shear force and associated lateral displacement at each increment, until the structure or collapse condition.

    Purpose of Pushover Analysis

    It is expected that most buildings rehabilitated in accordance with a standard, would perform within the desired levels when subjected to the design earthquakes. Structures designed according to the existing seismic codes provide minimum safety to preserve life and in a major earthquake, they assure at least gravity-load-bearing elements of non-essential facilities will still function and provide some margin of safety. However, compliance with the standard does not guarantee such performance. They typically do not address performance of non-structural components neither provide differences in performance between different structural systems. This is because it cannot accurately estimate the inelastic strength and deformation of each member due to linear elastic analysis. Although an elastic analysis gives a good indication of elastic capacity of structures and indicates where first yielding will occur, it cannot predict failure mechanisms and account for redistribution of forces during progressive yielding.

     

    To overcome this disadvantages different nonlinear static analysis method is used to estimate the inelastic seismic performance of structures, and as the result, the structural safety can be secured against an earthquake. Inelastic analysis procedures help demonstrate how buildings really work by identifying modes of failure and the potential for progressive collapse. The use of inelastic procedures for design and evaluation helps engineers to understand how structures will behave when subjected to major earthquakes, where it is assumed that the elastic capacity of the structure will be exceeded. This resolves some of the uncertainties associated with code and elastic procedures. The overall capacity of a structure depends on the strength and deformation capacities of the individual components of the structure. In order to determine capacities beyond the elastic limit  some form of nonlinear analysis, like Pushover Analysis, is required.

     

     

     

    Theory on which it is based

    There are two nonlinear procedures using pushover methods:  

    a)       Capacity Spectrum Method,

    b)       Displacement Coefficient Method. 

    In STAAD Displacement Coefficient method has been followed.

    Displacement Coefficient Method is to find target displacement which is the maximum displacement that the structure is likely to be experienced during the design earthquake. It provides a numerical process for estimating the displacement demand on the structure, by using a bilinear representation of capacity curve and a series of modification factors, or coefficients, to calculate a target displacement. Refer Section 3.3.3.3.2 of FEMA 356: 2000 for detailed description of calculation of target displacement

    Types of non-linearity 
    Both geometric and material non-linearities are considered in this static nonlinear pushover analysis.
    Geometric non-linearity 
    This is a type of non-linearity where the structure is still elastic, but the effects of large deflections cause the geometry of the structure to change, so that linear elastic theory breaks down. Typical problems that lie in this category are the elastic instability of structures, such as in the Euler bulking of struts and the large deflection analysis of a beam-column member. In general, it can be said that for geometrical non-linearity, an axially applied compressive force in   a member decreases its bending stiffness, but an axially applied tensile force increases its bending stiffness. In addition, P-Delta effect is also included in this concept.
    Material non-linearity 
    In this type of non-linearity, material undergoes plastic deformation. Material non-linearity can be modeled as discrete hinges at a number of locations along the length of a frame (beam or column) element and a discrete hinge for a brace element as discrete material fibers distributed over the cross-section of the element, or as a series of material points throughout the element.
     
     
     
     
    Frame element hinge properties
     
    Discrete hinge properties for frame elements are based on FEMA-356 criteria as per Section 5.5.2.2.2.  
                                                    
                       
    Figure1.6 Generalized Force-Deformation Relationship for Components
     
    • Point A is the origin
    • Point B represents yielding. No deformation occurs in the hinge up to point B, regardless of the deformation value specified for point B. The displacement (rotation or axial elongation as the case may be) will be subtracted from the displacements at points C, D and E. Only plastic deformation beyond point B will be exhibited by hinge.
    • Point C represents ultimate capacity of plastic hinge. At this point hinge strength degradation begins (hinge starts shedding load) until it reaches point D.
    • Point D represents the residual strength of the plastic hinge. Beyond point D the component responds with substantially strength to point E.
    • Point E represnts total failure. At deformation greater than point E the plastic hinge will drop load to zero.
     
    This diagram represent for those component actions which are ductile (e.g. Hinge formation for bending moment about local z axis of beam). For force-controlled action, Type 3 curve is followed. Refer Table C2-1 of FEMA 356 : 2000 for examples of possible deformation-controlled and force-controlled actions.

     

     

     

     

     

    Lateral Load Distribution as per Section 3.3.3.2.3 Chapter 3 FEMA 356

     Lateral load can be applied by following three methods.

     Method 1  

    The vertical distribution of the base shear shall be as specified in this section for all buildings. The lateral load applied at any floor level x shall be determined in accordance with equation (1-8-1) and equation (1-8-2):

                                     Fx = CvxV                          …………………………. (1-8-1)

    where    

                                                        wxhkx

                                    Cvx = --------------------   …………………………. (1-8-2)

        n

      S wihki

      i = 1

    Method 2

     A vertical distribution proportional to the shape of the fundamental mode in the direction under consideration is performed. Use of this distribution shall be permitted only when more than 75% of the  total mass participates in the fundamental mode in the direction under consideration, and the uniform distribution is also used. 

                                                    wx Fx

                                    Fx = --------------- V

       n

     S   wi Fi

      i = 1

     

     

    Method 3  

    A vertical distribution is performed consisting of lateral forces at each level proportional to the total mass at each level . 

                                                  wx

                                    Fx = --------- V

                                             n

                                            S   wi

                                                                  i = 1

     

     

    where,

     

    Cvx          =  Vertical distribution factor

    k              =  2.0 for T 2.5 seconds ≥

    =  1.0 for T 0.5 seconds ≤

         Linear interpolation shall be used to calculate values of for intermediate values of k for                 

         intermediate values of T.

    V             =  User defined base shear

    wi            =  Portion of the total building weight W located on or assigned to floor level i

    wx            =  Portion of the total building weight W located on or assigned to floor level x

    hi             =  Height (in ft) from the base to floor level i

    hx            =  Height (in ft) from the base to floor level x

    Fx                =  Amplitude of mode a floor level  x

      

    Masses
    The method involves 2 matrices – the stiffness matrix and the mass matrix.
    The stiffness matrix, usually called the [K] matrix, is assembled using data such as member and element lengths, member and element properties, modules of elasticity, poison’s ratio, member and element release, member offsets, support information, etc.
    For assembling the mass matrix, called the [M] matrix, the input is weights, not masses. Internally, STAAD will convert weights to masses by dividing the input by “g” the acceleration due to gravity.
    Example.
    Illustrate the procedure and results find the bellow STAAD example
    STAAD PLANE
    START JOB INFORMATION
    ENGINEER DATE 07-Oct-05
    END JOB INFORMATION
    INPUT WIDTH 79
    UNIT INCHES KIP
    JOINT COORDINATES
    1 0 0 0; 2 0 118.11 0; 3 118.11 118.11 0; 4 118.11 0 0; 5 0 236.22 0;
    6 118.11 236.22 0; 7 0 354.331 0; 8 118.11 354.331 0; 9 0 472.441 0;
    10 118.11 472.441 0; 11 236.22 118.11 0; 12 236.22 0 0; 13 236.22 236.22 0;
    14 236.22 354.331 0; 15 236.22 472.441 0;
    MEMBER INCIDENCES
    1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 3 4; 4 2 5; 5 5 6; 6 6 3; 7 5 7; 8 7 8; 9 8 6; 10 7 9; 11 9 10;
    12 10 8; 13 3 11; 14 6 13; 15 8 14; 16 10 15; 17 11 12; 18 13 11; 19 14 13;
    20 15 14;
    DEFINE MATERIAL START
    ISOTROPIC STEEL
    E 29732.7
    POISSON 0.3
    DENSITY 0.000283
    ALPHA 1.2e-005
    DAMP 0.03
    END DEFINE MATERIAL
    MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
    2 5 13 14 TABLE ST W16X26
    8 11 15 16 TABLE ST W16X26
    1 3 4 6 17 18 TABLE ST W24X55
    7 9 10 12 19 20 TABLE ST W24X55
    CONSTANTS
    MATERIAL STEEL ALL
    SUPPORTS
    1 4 12 FIXED
    DEFINE PUSHOVER DATA
    FRAME 2
    FYE 36.000000 ALL
    GNONL 1
    DISP X 15 JOINT 10
    LDSTEP 250
    SPECTRUM PARAMETERS
    DAMPING 5.0000
    SC 1
    SS 1
    S1 1
    SAVE LOADSTEP RESULT DISP 0.010000
    END PUSHOVER DATA
    LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Gravity  
    SELFWEIGHT Y -1
    MEMBER LOAD
    2 5 8 11 13 TO 16 UNI GY -.4
    PERFORM PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
    FINISH
     
     
    Figure 1: Capacity Curve for a Structure in STAAD.Pro V8i
     
    Figure 2: Deflected shape at specified displacement for a Structure in STAAD.Pro V8i
     
    Figure 4: Beam Hinge results for a Structure in STAAD.Pro V8i
     
    STAAD Results
                P R O B L E M   S T A T I S T I C S
     
         NUMBER OF JOINTS/MEMBER+ELEMENTS/SUPPORTS =    15/    20/     3
     
               SOLVER USED IS THE IN-CORE ADVANCED SOLVER
     
         TOTAL PRIMARY LOAD CASES =    1, TOTAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM =     36
     
     NUMBER OF MODES REQUESTED              =     1
     NUMBER OF EXISTING MASSES IN THE MODEL =    24
     NUMBER OF MODES THAT WILL BE USED      =     1
     
        STAAD PLANE                                              -- PAGE NO.    3
     
                   CALCULATED FREQUENCIES FOR LOAD CASE       2
     
           MODE            FREQUENCY(CYCLES/SEC)         PERIOD(SEC)
     
     
             1                       1.292                  0.77396
     
                         MASS  PARTICIPATION FACTORS IN PERCENT
                        
     
               MODE    X     Y     Z     SUMM-X   SUMM-Y   SUMM-Z
     
                 1   79.94  0.00  0.00   79.944    0.000    0.000
     
     
    • STAAD.Pro
    • TechNote
    • pushover analysis
    • Share
    • History
    • More
    • Cancel
    • Sreedhar Kalavagunta Created by Bentley Colleague Sreedhar Kalavagunta
    • When: Thu, Jun 17 2010 4:17 AM
    • Steve Crabtree Last revision by Steve Crabtree
    • When: Wed, Jun 22 2016 1:14 PM
    • Revisions: 6
    • Comments: 0
    Recommended
    Related
    Communities
    • Home
    • Getting Started
    • Community Central
    • Products
    • Support
    • Secure File Upload
    • Feedback
    Support and Services
    • Home
    • Product Support
    • Downloads
    • Subscription Services Portal
    Training and Learning
    • Home
    • About Bentley Institute
    • My Learning History
    • Reference Books
    Social Media
    •    LinkedIn
    •    Facebook
    •    Twitter
    •    YouTube
    •    RSS Feed
    •    Email

    © 2023 Bentley Systems, Incorporated  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy |  Terms of Use  |  Cookies