Bentley Communities
Bentley Communities
  • Site
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
RAM | STAAD | ADINA
  • Product Communities
RAM | STAAD | ADINA
RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki Torsional provision Consideration in IS 1893 (Part-1) 2016 Response Spectrum Analysis
    • Sign In
    • -RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki
      • +ADINA
      • +iTwin Analytical Synchronizer_
      • +Structural Analysis Support Solutions
      • +RAM Concept
      • +RAM Connection
      • +RAM Elements
      • +RAM SBeam
      • +RAM Structural System
      • -STAAD.Pro
        • +Revision History
        • -STAAD.Pro Support Solutions
          • STAAD.Pro Safety Related Features
          • -Analytical Modeling workflow
            • -STAAD.Pro Analysis Solutions
              • +Advanced Analysis
              • +Buckling Analysis
              • +DIRECT ANALYSIS
              • +Dynamic Analysis
              • +Eigen Solution
              • +Floor Response Spectrum Analysis
              • +Instability And Zero Stiffness
              • +Miscellaneous Analysis Solutions
              • +PDELTA Analysis
              • +Pushover Analysis
              • -Response Spectrum Analysis
                • Are beam section forces reported by STAAD.Pro for a response spectrum load case accurate?
                • Base Shear Does Not Match the Summation of Shears
                • Calculation of story drift for response spectrum load case
                • Direction Factor (f1, f2 and f3) for Response Spectrum load case for IS 1893(Part-1)-2016
                • Do we need to add Static Seismic Load cases additionally while performing Response Spectrum Analysis using IS1893(Part-1)2016 code?
                • How do I use the CUT OFF MODE command?
                • How Does Ground Acceleration Scale Factor Work
                • How Multiplying factor Vb/VB is taken into consideration in STAAD for IS1893 2016 code?
                • How to Input the Missing Mass Correction Command
                • I added dead+live load as seismic mass. Do I need need to define these loads separately too ?
                • In base shear what is considered as the base
                • Is Design Ground Acceleration Correct
                • IS:1893 (Part-I)-2002 Response Spectrum Philosophy
                • Missing mass – How to Consider
                • Multiple Floor Spectrum Generation Block Not Allowed
                • No Unsupported Masses Entered Error
                • Rayleigh Method Calculate Natural Frequency
                • Response spectrum analysis with compression only springs
                • Results from a response spectrum analysis
                • Scale Factor (f4) value for Response Spectra
                • Should I specify Response Spectrum in ALL directions in the same load case
                • Spectrum Load Case Joint Failing?
                • The natural frequencies obtained during a Response Spectrum Analysis do not match the Calculate Rayleigh Frequency
                • Torsional provision Consideration in IS 1893 (Part-1) 2016 Response Spectrum Analysis
                • When Specifying Damping, the Displacements and Forces Remain Same
                • Why are beam graphs not displayed for response spectrum load cases in STAAD.Pro
              • +Seismic Analysis
              • +Time History Analysis
            • +STAAD.Pro Design Solutions
            • +STAAD.Pro General Solutions
            • +STAAD.Pro Import/Export Solutions
            • +STAAD.Pro Modeling Solutions
          • +Building Planner workflow
          • +Connection Design workflow
          • +Physical Modeling workflow
          • +Piping workflow
          • +Postprocessing workflow
          • +Steel AutoDrafter workflow
        • +STAAD.Pro OpenSTAAD
        • +(+) Archived Wikis
        • +STAAD.Pro - Known Issues
        • +STAAD.Pro Download/Installation/Performance/Security
        • +STAAD.Pro Licensing Solutions
        • +STAAD.Pro Webinars/Videos/Events
      • +STAAD Foundation Advanced
      • +STAAD Advanced Concrete Design (RCDC)
      • +STAAD.building
      • +STAAD RCDC FE
      • +Scenario Services
      • +STAAD.offshore
      • +Limcon
      • +Microstran
      • +MStower
      • +Structural Dashboard
      • +Structural WorkSuite
    • +RAM | STAAD Learning Resources
    • Simplifications to Bentley's Engineering Simulation Software Licenses

     
     Questions about this article, topic, or product? Click here. 

    Torsional provision Consideration in IS 1893 (Part-1) 2016 Response Spectrum Analysis

       
      Applies To 
       
      Product(s): STAAD.Pro
      Version(s): All
      Environment:  N/A
      Area:  STAAD.Pro Analysis Solution
      Subarea:  Response Spectrum Analysis
      Original Author: SANJIB DAS, Bentley Global Technical Support Group
       

    IS1893 (Part-1)- 2016 standard has provided the following guideline –

    STAAD.Pro CE can consider this provision in Response Spectrum load cases in the presence of Rigid Diaphragm in the model. There are two parameters to be considered-

    DEC- It is a factor which when multiplied with static eccentricity (i.e., eccentricity between center of mass and center of rigidity) gives dynamic eccentricity. Since the applied load is acting at the center of mass, the effect of inherent torsion arising due to static eccentricity is included in the analysis.

    When ECC > 0, DEC defaults to 1.5

    When ECC < 0, DEC defaults to 1.0

    ECC- It is a factor which indicates the extent of accidental eccentricity. For all buildings this factor is to be provided as 0.05 or -0.05. Negative values are allowed.

    Let us consider X direction IS1893 Seismic load case, we need to have following load cases to cater the requirements-

    LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Seismic-H  TITLE RSX +VE

    SPECTRUM SRSS IS1893 2016 TOR DEC 1.5 ECC 0.05 X 0.036 DAMP 0.05

    SOIL TYPE 1

    LOAD 7 LOADTYPE Seismic-H  TITLE RSX -VE

    SPECTRUM SRSS IS1893 2016 TOR DEC 1 ECC -0.05 X 0.036 DAMP 0.05

    SOIL TYPE 1

    Please have a look into DEC and ECC parameter values. In one set, DEC will be 1.5 and ECC 0.05. In another set DEC will be 1 and ECC -0.05.

    This process should be repeated in Z directional seismic load case. There is no requirement to consider torsional provision in Y direction.

    • Torsional provision
    • STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition
    • IS1893 2016 part1
    • response spectrum analysis
    • Share
    • History
    • More
    • Cancel
    • DSANJU Created by Bentley Colleague DSANJU
    • When: Tue, Sep 27 2022 9:18 AM
    • Abhisek M Last revision by Bentley Colleague Abhisek M
    • When: Mon, Jun 26 2023 7:48 AM
    • Revisions: 3
    • Comments: 0
    Recommended
    Related
    Communities
    • Home
    • Getting Started
    • Community Central
    • Products
    • Support
    • Secure File Upload
    • Feedback
    Support and Services
    • Home
    • Product Support
    • Downloads
    • Subscription Services Portal
    Training and Learning
    • Home
    • About Bentley Institute
    • My Learning History
    • Reference Books
    Social Media
    •    LinkedIn
    •    Facebook
    •    Twitter
    •    YouTube
    •    RSS Feed
    •    Email

    © 2023 Bentley Systems, Incorporated  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy |  Terms of Use  |  Cookies