InRoads SS2 - existing dtm creation best practices

Hello,

I have a 8 DTM's that were given to me to create 1 DTM for a highway interchange project that is about 2 miles in length. The client was unable to merge the dtm's due to file size. I was given the task of merging the 8 DTM's

The DTM's were originally created by a sub of the client using random points which was lidar data. The client went back and added survey breaklines defining the roadway crown and shoulders, barriers, etc...

The DTM's looked good.

Someone then did edits to the model. Only when the edits were completed, someone imported the triangles as breaklines.

When I went to attempt the merge the surfaces, the files became so large that the computer ran out of memory. This probably due to the fact that the triangles are shapes and when imported as breaklines resulted in duplicate information. This is because the adjacent triangle legs and points are duplicated.

So, I am looking for opinions on the best practices for constructed this DTM. My thoughts are using the random points, breaklines and interior shapes. Only problem is that I would have to go back and address the edits that were already performed on the triangles.

looking for opinions?

Parents
  • If the triangles were imported as breaklines, then they should be a feature(s). Can you just delete them or set them to DNC?
  • Thanks for the reply. The DTM has only triangles in it. No random points or anything else.

    Joe Lukovits

    User Since TDP in the 80's,

    Vax based Unix Workstations - Interpro32,

    from the Intergraph Corp.

     

     

  • I had a similar situation on a project quite a few years ago. Before I joined the firm, someone had taken the the DTM over to Land Desktop and then brought it back. At this point, every triangle edge was a breakline and the surface was unworkable. I needed to punch holes in it to bring in new survey data and the edges of the holes were cutting triangle legs at random locations and sometimes those triangle were really bogus areas where they should have been trimmed.
    Eventually, I went back to the original 3D photogrammetry cad files and in some cases, back to the original survey fieldbooks. Once I rebuild these into my DTM I had a file that was much easier to work with.
    I would review the eight DTM's and see which ones seemed overwhelmed with random points or breaklines and see if I can thin or simplify them.
    In your case, I would want to make sure the lidar data was thinned, as that can overwhelm a DTM. There is a thin random points tool that can be used.
    Next I'd look at what files have triangles imported as breaklines. This creates issues as the extra processing to resolve every triangle leg as a breakline seems to really effect processing. If you have a 2D CADD file with linestrings that represent where breaklines should be of these DTM files, try changing all the breaklines into random points and then drape the linestrings using the vertices only setting to add simpler and far fewer breaklines back into the DTM.
    Lastly, I don't understand how a DTM can contain only triangles and nothing else. In InRoads, a DTM contains features and features can be DNC, random, breaklines, interior and exterior. I've seen features with no visible name (one or more blank characters) and with unknown styles (style assigned with one XIN but now loaded with a different XIN) and these can make it impossible to display the features. But I've never seen an InRoads DTM with triangle but no features.
    I've loaded GEOPAK TIN files and these seem to only load random points but I've been told if the TIN had Breaklines, the DTM would also have breakline.

    Charles (Chuck) Rheault
    CADD Manager

    MDOT State Highway Administration
    Maryland DOT - State Highway Administration User Communities Page

    • MicroStation user since IGDS, InRoads user since TDP.
    • AutoCAD, Land Desktop and Civil 3D, off and on since 1996
  • Thanks Cop,

    You are right on with your comments. Just to clarify, the triangles were imported from a microstation 3d file. They were assigned a feature (BREAKLINE) and a style (BRKLN). If you analyze the triangle (edit feature command) it is has 3 points.

    You are correct the dtm is not usuable.

    BTW - this is a non-feature based DTM. A breakline is a breakline, a random point is a random point.

    I am trying to convince the client that we need to build the DTM using the breaklines and random points, along with incorporating the edits.

    will know more next week.

    Thanks,

    Joe Lukovits

    User Since TDP in the 80's,

    Vax based Unix Workstations - Interpro32,

    from the Intergraph Corp.

     

     

  • The Drape 2D Graphics on now random points would probably work with this dataset. I have to sometimes work with AutoCAD files or people who used GEOPAK where all the linework for plan view graphics is 2D or in 2D files. So I have found it useful on multiple occasions.
    When I ask for LandXML or 3D CAD linework, some people look at me like I have two heads.

    Charles (Chuck) Rheault
    CADD Manager

    MDOT State Highway Administration
    Maryland DOT - State Highway Administration User Communities Page

    • MicroStation user since IGDS, InRoads user since TDP.
    • AutoCAD, Land Desktop and Civil 3D, off and on since 1996
Reply Children
No Data