Station/Offset/Elevation Report for Template Point in OpenRoads

I'm trying to create a report that gives me the Offset/Elevation of a template point at a set interval based off the stationing of the Main alignment.

Example:
I have a DITCH_CEN_LT point that defines the center of my ditch on the left side of my template. I want to create a report that will give me the Offset/Elevation of that point every 50' along the alignment used to create the corridor. IE: 1012+00, 1012+50, 1013+00, 1013+50, etc etc.

Currently I tried using the Station Offset Report tool inside of Analysis & Reporting. I select my main Alignment, I select the 2D linework created by DITCH_CEN_LT, under options I have the interval set to 50 ... but when the report spits out the info it starts at 1038+11.83 ... the first station where DITCH_CEN_LT appears (There is a different template drop before that does not include DITCH_CEN_LT).

EDIT: And as I look closer I'm realizing, it's not even spitting them out every 50 feet. It's 1038+11.83, 1038+61.50, 1039+07.96 ... I don't understand this report.

Is there away to have it spit out a report that does it starting at the station of my choosing, like a nice round number?

Thanks,
Chris Williams

Parents
  • It sounds off topic, but I'm not sure that it is. If you're running Geopak .872, is this corridor derived from an alignment that has a profile that starts someplace other than at the very beginning of the alignment?

    In my trial just now of the station offset report (because you got me curious), it seems to report only key points such as points of curvature or points of intersection. What you're probably observing is that the points it is reporting are at cross sections that are rendered in the model.
  • I'm running GEOPAK .789.

    The corridor is indeed derived from an alignment that the profile does not start at the very beginning, but the stations it's giving me are not rendered points. The template drops are every 5 feet and that's what the 3D model shows. I understand what you're trying to say, that it is only giving me points where the model had to calculate extra information, but that does not seem to be the case.

    Thanks for the thought though.
Reply Children
No Data