<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Corridor Modeling Template Developement for Divided Sections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/14686/corridor-modeling-template-developement-for-divided-sections</link><description>What is the best practice for template/component development of a divided section? More specifically, should a 36' median component be built in half, and then mirrored over to complete the median portion?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Re: Corridor Modeling Template Developement for Divided Sections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/28460?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:29:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:541e7a74-9982-4dc5-a1e7-3c1ccf34bbe9</guid><dc:creator>caddcop</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;
Not to add anything to the current discussion, but to solicit ideas on this topic...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I am curious to hear what others are doing to create corridors that contain a mixture of divided and un-divided roads. Frequently, it is necessary to setup a corridor with sections having no medians with other sections containing medians between those areas. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have tried a number of approaches to address these designs, but none seem to stand out as the optimum, or ideal solution.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please feel free to offer any&amp;nbsp;comments as to solutions that you have tried.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Corridor Modeling Template Developement for Divided Sections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/28101?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:21:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:081a6669-17dc-4222-b95b-3c14c6741e21</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Taylor [Bentley Civil]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;
this is correct. if you experiment with the affixes on and off in combination with the mirror option, you will get the desired results for naming all points. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In general&amp;nbsp;I create the Paving buildup portions as individual templates (or grouping of components and then assemble into a paevment section. Then I D&amp;amp;D the section into the divided&amp;nbsp;highway template with affixes and mirror on.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I use naming conventions like the following (left side of divided highway)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
LOS (Lt Outside Shldr.), LOEP (Lt Ouside Edge of Pavement), LCP (Lt Centerline Pavement), LIEP (Lt Inside edge of Pavement), LIS (Lt Inside Shldr).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The master template contains the name except the L prefix.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
HTH
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thomas
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Corridor Modeling Template Developement for Divided Sections</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/28067?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:36:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:424b1625-6747-4e1f-9184-cba7a9727ebb</guid><dc:creator>caddcop</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;
It is frequently easier to build a symetrical template by using the mirror technique. Watch the point name and prefix/suffix settings for Left and Right sides - if you mirror a side already populated with left or right affixes, the mirrored side can end up with a double set.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To avoid this, build one side with apply affixes toggled off and then drag it into a new template with them turned on and with mirror turned on and both sides get proper affixes at one time.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>