Hi,
Is there a reason annotation works for some cross sections but not others even when the template point names are the same. When managing the annotation group for the cross sections, the points are highlighted in the preview. Some annotation displays but it's not consistent. Each of the side slopes is highlighted in the manage window as well but maybe 50% display.
Additionally, when you have multiple corridors, is it best to split up the named boundaries and cross section models by corridor?
Thanks!
Thanks for the data. I ended up having to log Defect 857286 for development to review. I experienced the same output that you describe. You could work around this by filtering the data a different way. I think annotating based on the Feature Definition will be quicker. All of your End Conditions start from a point with a Feature Definition called TL_Grass Berm Normal.
Set the Segments to be Filtered to Use All Segments.
Then, type in this expression: point1_feature_definition = "Linear\Template Points\Shoulder and Berm\TL_Grass Berm Normal"
This will annotate any segment whose first point has this feature definition. You may think of a better way to work around this defect, but I thought this might be clean and simple for you to use.
Holly
For more information about the Road and Site design tools, visit the Road and Site design WIKI at: http://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/w/road_and_site_design__wiki
Thanks Holly. Would there be a quick trick to have it work on both side slopes? That expression seems to label left to right from that template point so the right side slope labels correctly and the left labels the sidewalk side instead of side slope.
Holly, I am trying this expression in my own template and I am not able to get it to work?Have things changed since 2018 that would not let me do so?Appreciate any and all help!
Hi Holly,
Thanks for investigating this problem. I can confirm annotating cross sections is very hard to get stable. Indeed, annotating feature definitions is the most reliable ( by my experience), but even this results are not always chown. Results in Templates with the same annotated features (or for example point name) seems to be random.
also colleagues from other companies are complaining about this.
I hope this heavy used function will be reliable in the near feature.
Regards Louis
I'm trying to annotate the median using feature definitions but with no luck,
Is there an expression that I could use to achieve this? thanks!