ORD CE : Corridors Template Drop - there is a gap between the end station range and the created 3D template

RE: ORD CE : Corridors Template Drop - there is a gap between the end station range and the created 3D template

Cory Hallisey — Tue, 25 Jan 2022 18:15:41 GMT

Here I am 4 years later with the same problem and I guess the same work-around solution. Bummer.

RE: ORD CE : Corridors Template Drop - there is a gap between the end station range and the created 3D template

Mark Shamoun — Mon, 05 Mar 2018 21:51:43 GMT

Yep, I've had to create a key station +-1mm at every civil cell, switch turning shoulders off, etc.

It gets really annoying. I would have thought external control points for the corridor feature definition should have handled this?

RE: ORD CE : Corridors Template Drop - there is a gap between the end station range and the created 3D template

Ross Brown — Mon, 05 Mar 2018 18:07:37 GMT

Hi Martin

It sounds like you may need to add a key station here to zip up the corridor.... A key station forces an extra template drop in the corridor. The trick to using this tool is add or subtract 0.01m (I'm in metric in my part of the world)., to the stationing eg 0+99.99 in your case.

RE: ORD CE : Corridors Template Drop - there is a gap between the end station range and the created 3D template

Martin Koekemoer — Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:22:21 GMT

Thanks for the response.

The gaps are not from the transitions but between the road template and the template of the civil cell. The road template for example ends at station 0+100 and the the start of the civil cell starts at the same staining. But there is a gap.

RE: ORD CE : Corridors Template Drop - there is a gap between the end station range and the created 3D template

Marcus Blake — Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:16:49 GMT

Are these gaps occurring between template transitions? If so, you may consider the following workflow:https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/w/road_and_site_design__wiki/19056/video-create-transition-between-templates