Just looking to get an idea on what others are doing in regards to OpenRoads modeling elements vs elements that aren't being modeled. Maybe there is a best practice for this?
Opinions on defining levels that are specific for "modeled" graphics/elements created from OpenRoads. i.e. m_TOPO-CUTT, m_TOPO-FILL, m_ROAD-EDGE, m_SHLDR-EDGE, m_STORM-PIPE, m_STORM-INLT, etc... vs using the defined corporate levels of C-TOPO-CUTT, C-TOPO-FILL, etc... Is there a real good reason to separate them?
My thoughts are that we would replace the "C-" prefix with the prefix "m_". The "m_" signifies that these elements are modeled from software and not a "drafted" element.
Your comments are greatly appreciated.
Chuck
I guess it depends on how easy it will be for your users to keep them straight.
If C_EOP and m_EOP look the same and are used for the same thing, it would be very easy for a user to just "match" m_EOP and start drawing.
MaryB
Power GeoPak 08.11.09.918Power InRoads 08.11.09.918OpenRoads Designer 2021 R2
Yeah, I was thinking the same. Thanks for your reply.