Existing Serpentine Driveway/Sidewalk in Cross-section

PowerGeopak SS4 with ORD tech: I want to show and existing sidewalk/driveway/parking lot along a roadway in cross-section.  The driveways/sidewalk are not perpendicular to the road and are independent of the road.  Some driveways/sidewalk turn on themselves in a serpentine fashion when viewed from the road.  I have not been able to determined how to get these to appear in the cross-section using templates using PowerGeopak SS4 with ORD tech.  Any suggestion on how to approach this?

  • The key this (and other similar) questions is to remind ourselves that we are making models now with cross-sections as by product. Back in the day, for GEOPAK users, we designed cross-sections and the model was a by-product, assuming you had sufficient patience and need to develop a model from cross-sections.

    So, the answer is: This particular driveway needs to be modeled just like a side road.  In my opinion, ALL driveways should be treated as side roads and actually modeled rather than trying to trick something into the cross-sections.  One or two bullet proof civil cells will be key to efficiency. Then the process is:

    1. Alignment for the driveway (this is new for some designers)
    2. Proposed profile for the driveway (this is also new for some)
    3. Drop a civil cell on the alignments.

    Yes, I know, this is potentially a LOT of alignments.  Not a big deal here in TN since driveway alignments and profiles must be labeled on plans anyway. But for some of you on some projects this is potentially multiple hundreds of alignments which you have never needed before.  

    How long does it take for the above workflow? Assuming you have a good civil cell, it takes me about 10 minutes per driveway. On a large urban project, it takes a week or so just for driveways. 

    What's the up side?:

    • Your model is more complete.
    • Placement of side drains and associated head walls are exact rather than approximations.
    • Various volumes related to the driveway are much easier since they are reportable from the model.

    I have heard various rumblings from various people that suggest a civil cell for driveways should be possible which does not require the alignment and profile. However, I have never seen one which actually works and I would be very surprised if current civil cell technology is robust enough to make the necessary decisions.    

    Robert Garrett
    Senior Consultant

    www.envisioncad.com

  • Thanks, that is the direction I was expecting to take.

  • There is another option, but it can be time consuming. Create a bunch of terrain elements using the 3D elements that represent sidewalk edges as breaklines. In some cases, they can be boundary types, to prevent stray triangle edges. Then apply a surface template representing the existing sidewalk distance. Repeat for driveways/parking lots. Then when sections are cut, the surface templates will show as existing thickness. I cannot take credit for this - a long time GEOPAK user who worked with us on our Ss4 workspace came up with this technique. We have a small set of element templates that are defined for use with the surface templates, so we get dashed lines for any existing pavement and solid for proposed. 


    Charles (Chuck) Rheault
    CADD Manager

    MDOT State Highway Administration

    • MicroStation user since IGDS, InRoads user since TDP.
    • AutoCAD, Land Desktop and Civil 3D, off and on since 1996
  • This is the method I have been using as well.  Agreed... It may take longer then using a Civil Cell but I get the exact result I desire and at this result is more important to me than speed.   

    Tom Cox IDOT District 6 Cadd / GIS Manager