I trying to setup a schedule for Openroads Designer software updates with my IT staff, but I no idea when the updates will be released.
jpln said:I agree that naming is sometime confusing.
I have to say it's always confusing. It's subjective and personal opinion, but when I ask my customers for e.g. MicroStation or OpenCities version, they usually know it, but when we are discussing ORD issues, they typically do not. It's too long and not intuitive.
jpln said:However, using same numbering than MicroStation could also confuse.
My experience is that it's not so big issue, because whereas product name is important for user, internal platform version is something that typically CAD admins and developers take care about.
Regards,
Jan
Bentley Accredited Developer: iTwin Platform - AssociateLabyrinth Technology | dev.notes() | cad.point
To some degree I agree with you regarding stability but what is our main pain on the job which we have been working on for over a year is that we have number of files which to open takes 5-10 minutes, we have corridors which take to process even 30 minutes (the corridors are up to 4km long per DGN), and we experienced files which don't open at all or open with an error. So the time we gained at the beginning of the job is now wasted by unpredictable behavior of the software.
I have contacted Krzysztof offline and we are looking at some of the performance issues.
Simon Pegg
Bentley Civil Support
Krzysztof, do you think my 315km rail line is overly optimistic? ;-)
I've cut it into smaller sections but even 40km doesn't work. The annotation locks up, and the profile is so slow it is unusable.
There is a saying in English, "Biting off more than one can chew".
Maybe Jan is right...?
Neville du Plessis
Rail Design
Neville, stay with SS2