Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

ilyas — Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:36:53 GMT

Thanks Jeremie .

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

JeremieDL — Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:49:26 GMT

Actualy I had not acess to the whole conversation at the time of my initial reply so the civil labeler is party the answer. There is no solution out of the box to do this, but with item type you can get the starting station of your line (or point) based on a reference alignement. So if you place a point or a starting line at every crossing "place" that you want (and then attach the item types) you could then make a microstation report that would get all those stations. And of course if you have that information you could also annotate it with civil labeler or annotation groups

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

ilyas — Sun, 16 Jul 2023 14:24:04 GMT

Hi Jeremie

Can you please share how we can dot it, Thanks in advance.

Regards

Ilyas

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

JeremieDL — Sat, 15 Jul 2023 17:06:08 GMT

You can do that with civil labeler, just try it

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

ilyas — Fri, 14 Jul 2023 13:16:25 GMT

ANY UPDATE ON THE ABOVE REQUEST, IT IS ALMOST THREE YEARS

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

ilyas — Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:22:27 GMT

Greetings,

Any update on the Enhancement request 1092677 Intersecting Alignment Stations.

Regards

Ilyas

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

Jacob Dean — Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:35:44 GMT

I don't have any updates on the development side of things, but I'm glad you followed-up because I realized I forgot to post the log information. It can be found below.

Enhancement 1092677:Intersecting Alignment Stations

Regards,
Jacob

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

MaryB — Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:00:54 GMT

I am not Ilyas, but it would be very helpful, on complicated projects to be able to select one alignment, and get a report of every other alignment that intersects it, with the stations of intersection for both the main (selected) alignment, and the auxilliary (intersecting) alignments.

This would streamline certain plan checking, where a report could be generated, and station intersection equations could be easily confirmed by the reviewer. Currently, they need to go into the drawings themselves and measure the distances or annotate the points themselves to confirm that the labels are correct.

In theory, labels are always generated automatically and so are always correct, but we may not be at that level of workspace completion for some time. And there is always the possibility that somebody will edit the text for whatever unknown reason, and the label will be out of sync. A report like this would streamline this sort of checking.

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

ilyas — Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:37:17 GMT

Any Updates on the above issue?

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

ilyas — Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:59:56 GMT

Greetings Jacob,

Thanks and appreciate for reporting this issue to Bentley, Actually this is one of the requirement while creating the plan and profile drawings. The construction engineers and designers need the crossing element report showing stationing, northing, easting, elevation.

Also in the previous SS4 Openroads we are importing the crossing elements report as cogo points to annotate the crossing elements in the profile.

What is the workaround to annotate the crossing elements in the profile in Open Roads Designer.

Regards

Ilyas

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

Jacob Dean — Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:46:04 GMT

If you would, post a description of your ideal Intersecting Alignment Stations report and why you want it, and I will include that information in the enhancement request.

Regards,

Jacob

RE: Intersecting Alignment Stations in ORD

Jacob Dean — Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:41:21 GMT

I don’t believe there is currently a report for intersecting alignment stations in ORD, so I will make an enhancement request for you to have it added. I will post the log information below once it is created.

Regards,

Jacob