I’ve gone through the LEARN courses on this, but I’m still not sure how to accomplish in ORD many things I currently do in PGPK SS2. I’ll limit my questions for this post to profiles.
I’m trying to understand the new profile workflow in ORD. In PGPK SS2 I used profile cells to see the entire profile for the whole corridor. I then drew in existing utilities and other elements that I wanted to see in profile. I also used the Draw Profile tool to show profiles for existing edge of pavement, existing sidewalks, etc. These are usually quite helpful when designing a proposed CL profile. I would often draw “target lines” in a profile dgn indicating elevations I want the design CL to hit. These could be several things (manhole rims, elevations needed to drain existing yards, etc.).
I think that’s it for now, but I see this as a major stumbling block of ORD with my current understanding.
Thank you.
My thought on how to generate a drawing of the whole profile is to create a "roll plot" type enormous sheet definition that would just show the entire thing.There isn't a profile drawing anymore, just like there aren't cross section drawings any more. They exist as "the model", and only get written to CAD when generating sheets.
Sheets are generated from Named Boundaries, and yes, you will be able to place these and review them before creating your actual sheets.
As I understand it, the profile view will be able to slice/project anything that is attached to the 3D model in the drawing you are creating the sheets in.I believe that if this information is attached in 3D model of the corridor drawing, it can also be seen in the dynamic profile.
But that may not all be true, and it may not be all that easy, depending how much you need to show that ISN'T directly related to your baseline. I'll have to defer to others about the utilities, but you may be able to add the profile to the utility feature.
They have removed a LOT of control from the profile, compared to GPK. There IS no profile drawing anymore, and you can no longer define it "separate" from the horizontal geometry. For better or worse (some of both in my book) your vertical geometry IS saved into your horizontal geometry, or projected from terrains and maybe features.
MaryB
Power GeoPak 08.11.09.918Power InRoads 08.11.09.918OpenRoads Designer 2021 R2
My past practice (PGKP SS2/10) was to draw profiles of existing utilities such as storm and sanitary sewers "manually" in a project-length profile. Is this still the best way to show various utilities in profile, or should I be modeling them? If they are not "sliced" by the alignment will they show up in a profile model?
Answer Verified By: Josh M
jpln,
Thank you. Your explanation and especially the video are a great help. I was actually going to attempt the workaround you mentioned in #5 and continue to simply draw the required existing utility profiles. I will have to look into actually modeling them at some point though.
Josh
It is not difficult to create a Utilities model for your utilities in ORD. They can then be displayed in plans, profiles, and cross-sections. No need to do them manually, which you would then have to revise manually when designs inevitably change. If you have the information to add them manually then you also have the information to model them. However, your WorkSpace will need the required DGN library for utility modeling with appropriate Feature Definitions, Feature Symbologies, Element Templates, as well as the 3D cell library.
Karl Dauber, PEAdvance ConsultingLaurens County, SCkarldauber@advconsult.netwww.advconsult.netwww.linkedin.com/in/karldauber