<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>[ORD 2020R3] SSD analysis takes ages</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/206887/ord-2020r3-ssd-analysis-takes-ages</link><description>Hi All, 
 We&amp;#39;re running some tests on 2020R3 and found that SSD analysis (with Move Target to achieve visibility option enabled) takes ages (right now around one hour and still processing) in comparison to the same analysis run in 2020R2 (used to take</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: [ORD 2020R3] SSD analysis takes ages</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/623316?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:32:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d5e7cc70-e163-4e83-a8b8-6d3eefd73fa4</guid><dc:creator>Adam Wieczorek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Krzysztof, we are struggling with the same issue. To determine real length of visibility lines we toggle on Move Target to Achieve Visibility, ORD 2020 R3 will not success with processing. In previous releases it worked as you wrote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, IMO 5minutes for a 3km long corridor seems to be a way to long. Imagine 30 km long motorway&amp;nbsp;we have on our drawing board. 2 lanes in each direction where you need to check the SSD. This makes 4 hrs just to check&amp;nbsp;the SSD.&amp;nbsp;Not mentioning we need variations of the object and eye heights. Well here old MX or InRoads seems to be supperrior to the ORD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adam&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW. Service Request we filled for this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;7001169879&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>