<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>[ORD 2020 R3] Modfiying Plan-View Named Boundaries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/209374/ord-2020-r3-modfiying-plan-view-named-boundaries</link><description>This post ties in to my earlier post about modifying Profile Named Boundaries. 
 Sometimes there is a need to modify a Plan Named Boundary. Perhaps you don&amp;#39;t need to show part of the last sheet that lies beyond the project limits, or you need to modify</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: [ORD 2020 R3] Modfiying Plan-View Named Boundaries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/658753?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 13:32:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:db9ae966-1d4f-47b3-bbb3-fd05674a82b3</guid><dc:creator>dominic SEAH</dc:creator><description>[quote userid="3866" url="~/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/209374/ord-2020-r3-modfiying-plan-view-named-boundaries"]However, the resulting Drawing Model&amp;#39;s reference files move and they are no longer at the correct coordinates.&amp;nbsp;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;I think that both Named Boundaries and Saved Views are both based on using the center of the View. So if the size of the view boundary changes, the view center changes and since the Reference attachment is using the view center as the insertion point, the Ref attachment will appear to move.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This problem was highlighted during the Mstn V8i SS3 beta almost a decade ago. It will probably take some effort to unfreeze the DV biniaries, make the changes, test and debug all those code modules that &amp;#39;touch&amp;#39; DVs... hopefully someone left a back door open, or sumpthink.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ideally, the SV and NB process should allow the user to define an anchor point that is independent to the view boundaries. One &lt;a href="/products/microstation/i/"&gt;idea&lt;/a&gt; is to include an ACS with the SV. Something similar would be needed for the NB tool / workflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1625318628359v1.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: [ORD 2020 R3] Modfiying Plan-View Named Boundaries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/647987?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 12:31:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:34c730e0-96d7-42b0-bd76-70b0d77e8e2a</guid><dc:creator>Brian Coogan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We had the same/similar issue. We wanted to capture more plan before the beginning of the alignment (essentially shift the first sheet to the left and the rest adjust automatically). The only solution we could come up with is extend the alignment and redo the sheets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: [ORD 2020 R3] Modfiying Plan-View Named Boundaries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/635480?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:06:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2133694b-bc70-42f3-ac33-e2c6e614f9bf</guid><dc:creator>Mariusz Heczko</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Josh,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Have you tried to adjust the named boundaries in plan (in main view) by dragging the handles? You should be also able to move the named boundaries. Then in corresponding drawing model, in attachment dialog select the referenced model and put back x and y offset values to zero - this will ensure that coordinates in drawing model correctly match the design model. The clipping boundary should adjust automatically. If you change size of the named boundaries then you may also need to adjust location of the referenced drawing model in sheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mariusz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: [ORD 2020 R3] Modfiying Plan-View Named Boundaries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/635284?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:21:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:23b61efd-089d-4735-9b76-429188972cb4</guid><dc:creator>Katie Wade</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are having the same issue.&amp;nbsp; We would like to shift the beginning sheet to capture more plan view at the beginning of the alignment.&amp;nbsp; Is there no good way to do this?&amp;nbsp; Perhaps someone from Bentley could weigh in?&amp;nbsp; I don&amp;#39;t find the redo option very acceptable, especially if we have already annotated some of the drawing models associated with this alignment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: [ORD 2020 R3] Modfiying Plan-View Named Boundaries</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/632715?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:01:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8563dc53-7d8a-4643-8f4f-03eebf4c3074</guid><dc:creator>Luke Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The new workflow is advantageous if you get everything right the first time.&amp;nbsp; I have not found a reliable means to edit or modify plan view named boundaries.&amp;nbsp; If there set wrong, its a re-do of placing the named boundaries.&amp;nbsp; Similarly, if the horizontal alignment is changed - the named boundaries do not automatically&amp;nbsp;adjust - resulting in a redo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>