Hej
any news on the ORD 2021 Release 1 date? We are expecting some improvements in annotation (annotating crossing points on profiles, item types on cross-sections), stability,running different versions in parallel, improve realibity of volumes calculation (for now, cut/fill meshes for site projects generates randomly with gaps). etc.
Hi, yes I am also very interested. I am focused on some news regardings IFC export control and better stability with mesh creation in cut/fill
yes, IFC export control would be great. For now we can only control this via turning on/off Feature Definitions. But this will not work when you have a master model (empty container) and all design models ar referenced there. Then no control over what is exported to the IFC.
Also, thanks to peers on this forum we can downgrade IFC to the version consumed by the Navisworks.
Adam
Best,
OpenRoads Designer 2022 (10.12) | OpenRail Designer 2022 (10.12)
Hi Adam, please can you make for me few screenshots what you mean "we can only control this via turning on/off Feature Definitions" - I do not not about this possibility (or I do not understand meaning:-)) Thank you
Unfortunately I wouldn't hold out for many changes to the IFC export function in ORD, effort seems to be in the iTwin side of things.
Good thing is that the ability to filter what publishes to IFC is in progress (Export filtered IFC files | iTwin Services Ideas (aha.io))
Regards,
Mark
OpenRoads Designer 2023 | Microstation 2023.1 | ProjectWise 2023
Hi Mark, I know about effords putted to IFC export withing iTwin services. But... problem with iTwin services is that I still not get any answer from bentley sales representatives or support how much I will pay for iTwin services and I will not try it without this importatnt infromation. I need to know how much shall I pay before I will start it use
Completely agree, the commercial side of itwin is a mess from what I've seen.
Yes Bentley´s huge trouble - mostly excelent product but tragical marketing