<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/220212/template-creation-for-superelevation</link><description>Hi. 
 I&amp;#39;m unable to find a topic on following issue, which seems to be quite easy, but...I&amp;#39;m designing in OpenRoads and in template there is a simple gravel layer - 20 cm high with rooftop type crosslopes - 4% each. As I create the superelevation, for</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/677658?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:38:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e3d079d7-2935-4a30-884a-037ac27103a7</guid><dc:creator>Gatis Gac</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s exactly what I did. Thanks for Your support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/677629?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:15:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:38da71b8-a138-428e-a1e8-49266713d2f1</guid><dc:creator>Martyna Szuper-Jeziorska</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think the best is to use formula instead of specific value for slope constraint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1634641960728v3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Point 3 has slope constraint to 4 and instead of value i&amp;nbsp;wrote formula that slope between 3 and 4 should be the same as&amp;nbsp;between pont 1 and 2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1634641867595v2.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;now each time when top slope will change, bottom slope follow the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope it is clear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Martyna&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/677595?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:40:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5657ea2e-d432-4e49-b405-c7804a201c03</guid><dc:creator>Gatis Gac</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not bad idea at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/674907?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 13:28:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7f65460c-51dc-4a82-9874-a27b9fa90a32</guid><dc:creator>Matt Murphy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is something quick I put together. Point 2 in my template is the new point you must add. It is constrained to Point 4 (horizontal = 0, vertical = h). And then constraints for Point 3 are shown in the screenshot with the vector offset.&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/Screenshot-2021_2D00_10_2D00_01-092628.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/674903?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 13:08:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ed071f4a-1e2e-45dd-bc9c-351bfa6c19a8</guid><dc:creator>Gatis Gac</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. I almost got You, but not quite. May I ask You to show it graphically...?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/674899?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 12:51:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7e3599a2-3063-41ac-996d-4e21aaf5c243</guid><dc:creator>Matt Murphy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You need an additional subgrade point constrained to cela_mala (horizontal = 0, vertical = h). Then grants_apaksa will be constrained to this new point (horizontal = x, vector-offset between ass_grants_apaska and the new point with a value of 0).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, the subgrade points do not need to have superelevation flag checked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/674833?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 06:25:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9b26f943-fa49-4f17-84ae-5ced250c9338</guid><dc:creator>Gatis Gac</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Guys, thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I defined that subgrade edge follows surface edge by constant &amp;quot;h&amp;quot; value as well as slope is defined to follow surfaces edge&amp;#39;s point. I attach printscreen. Is there any more efficient way? Or can these definitions compromise me any way?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S.I do appreciate Your effort for quick response. Respect!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/0728.Capture.JPG" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/674791?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:53:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5b1aae88-7b48-44cc-b536-e0e3faf50342</guid><dc:creator>Matt Murphy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Constraining your subgrade points to the surface points (which are controlled by the superelevation point control) should make it work. For example, a subgrade point would be constrained horizontal = 0 and vertical = subgrade depth.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Template creation for superelevation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/674780?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:20:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8e1835c0-bc8d-4410-a0d8-5c272dc47b14</guid><dc:creator>mwlong</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How are your points defined for the subgrade? By the way your template is behaving I am assuming the the subgrade point is set as a distance &amp;amp; slope from the center point.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>