I have a corridor where when my end condition linear feature goes from one feature to another it is either creating a gap or dropping the line. This only happens in some areas but not others. Picture 1 is how i want it to function. Picture 2 is my problem.
Picture 1
Picture 2
Gap in picture Two is due to different slopes on your Cut end condition and Fill end condition. Put a parametric constraint on one or both and transition the slope(s) so they match at the Station of the gap.
Gap in picture Three is probably due to inconsistent point naming or feature definitions. Use Feature Name Override on your end condition points so they all have the same name. Also verify that the Cut points have the same point Feature Definition and all the Fill points have the same point Feature Definition.
Finally, check the component names on your end conditions and enable Use Name Override if you have multiple end conditions in a template so all the components have the same name. Verify that the component Feature Definitions are the same for components that serve the same function.
HTH,
PE
If i use feature name override on the points i have no issues with the lines connecting but then i have the issue where i cannot maintain individual linestyles for cut, fill, etc.
Feature Name does not determine the symbology of the plan graphics. The Feature Name determines what point gets connected to the next, if there isn't a match they don't connect. The Feature Definition on a point determines how the line is drawn (symbology).
I understand that but when you set a feature name for two points with two different feature definitions. It uses the first feature definition throughout. If you use the feature override it does solve my problem but then I cannot maintain different feature definitions for cut and fill. It will connect the lines and establish my limits of construction but it does not keep the distinct linestyles and only uses one linestyle.