<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ORD: SOLVING WHERE PED RAIL IS NEEDED WITHIN A TEMPLATE WITH MULTI-SLOPE SOLUTION</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/234806/ord-solving-where-ped-rail-is-needed-within-a-template-with-multi-slope-solution</link><description>I am using a template with CUT &amp;amp; FILL Multi-slope Solutions (1:6, 1:4, 1:3, 1:2) with a priority for each one of them. My question: even with the CUT &amp;amp; FILL multi-slope solution, has anyone been able to create a rule or maybe a null point that would solve</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: ORD: SOLVING WHERE PED RAIL IS NEEDED WITHIN A TEMPLATE WITH MULTI-SLOPE SOLUTION</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/729348?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 01:05:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:87190354-af89-4e3b-a3fa-b84654e29a50</guid><dc:creator>Ramiro Vara</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;jpln-For Case 1: I utilized Constraint Type of Horizontal Minimum &amp;amp; Vector-Offset added 2 Null Points Parent 1 &amp;amp; Parent 2 as shown in the screen shot below and it worked. It followed along the 1:2 slope down. Case&amp;nbsp;2 was similar.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5922/pastedimage1661994168003v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: ORD: SOLVING WHERE PED RAIL IS NEEDED WITHIN A TEMPLATE WITH MULTI-SLOPE SOLUTION</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/729228?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:54:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a12ca5f6-3c4f-4270-a9b5-9d541e925a20</guid><dc:creator>jpln</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For CASE 1 I would use a null point (P2) vertically placed so that it is always above design, with vertical constraint project to design (down) and a horizontal offset 2 feet from edge of sidewalk (P1). Then you can set a display rule to measure vertical distance betwee edge of sidewalk and this point to check if &amp;lt;-10 inches. If no design found or cut, then the vertical distance should remain positive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For CASE 2, the same principle but with point (P2) placed hoizontally 0 at 2 feet from edge of sidewalk and project left to design, vertically -60inches from point (P1) that is 2 feet from edge of sidewalk (worst case for slope). Display rule horizontal between P1 and P2 &amp;gt; 0 and slope P1 to P2 &amp;gt; 1:2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>