I have a roadway with a rather simple template - just 2 points on each side of the centerline. The first point is controlled horizontally by a feature, the second has a constant hor. distance and a slope, which has to be perpenducarly to the feature controlling the first point...
If I do not check "use as secondary alignment" in the point control dialog box, everything works fine - but the surface is not as I want it - the second point has to be perpendicular to the first one.
If I do check "use as secondary alignment" in the point control dialog box, it doesn't add a exterior boundary and triangulates wrong - errors occur, boundary crossing itself and so on...
Any ideas why?
See attached pdf for better explanation here : InRoads.pdf (is it not possible to attach files?)
Best regards, Martin
Problem solved by using alignments as point controls instead of features.
Check your inbox :-)
Martin,
I'm not sure why the exterior boundary is not being applied when the Secondary alignments are used. If you would send me your data, I would be glad to take a look.
Denis