MX RENEW - non-parametric design

Offline aleksander_zamorski over 13 years ago

Hallo,

I design a modernization of dual-carriageway road (each carriageway separately with own vertical alignment but common horizontal alignment - in place of base alignment) with following procedure:

First scheme
Design of a base alignment,
Design of carrigeway with input file,
First parametric design which is generating an non-geometrical section string callad "LFIT",
Alignment design with MX options (element method) to get an geometrical alignment (S8 OS JP),
Generating new model containing new design edges with input file (S8 JP FIN),
Second scheme with no parametric design.

And here is step-by-step my journey through non-parametric design (chapter 7):

Design/Road Redesign and Rehabilitation/Create New Scheme: S8 MOD V3, unchecked box: Use Parametric Design Methods

1. Function Control/Define Surface Wizard:

Design Surface: Design Surface Model Name: S8 JP FIN / Design Alignment String Name: MCJP
Specify Design Edge Strings/Use Design Edges/Left Side Design String: CS1I, Right Side Design String: CE1I
Base Alignment: Base Alignment Model Name: S8 OS JP / Base Alignment String Name: MC10
Start and End: Start: (Chainage) 376000 / End (Chainage) 386000,

Next >

Dailog box: Base and design references are different… Ok >

2. Existing Surface and Pavement Edge Strings:

Existing Surface Model: MAPA CP (TRIA) / Triangulation String Name: TX00
Existing Edges Definition (Optional) / Model Containing Exist Edge Strings: MAPA JP STRINGS /
Edge of Pavement - Left: CE0K / Edge of Pavement - Right: CE02
Offsets: Offset of Section Left - 10.0 / Offset of Section Right - 100.0

Next >

3. Existing Pavement Relative to Alignment :

Finish >

And here MX Renew stops (from journal file):

...
EDIT,S8 MOD V3 MXR SECTIONS
031,E
999
DELETE,S8 MOD V3 MXR DESIGN
EDIT,S8 MOD V3 MXR SECTIONS
031,1
...
031,V
999

and collapsed. The scheme is created but it is corrupted an haven't full functionality.

I have attached files with models I am working with. Could anyone check if my way is correct?

Best regards,
Aleksander Zamorski