<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Alternate Surface Triangulation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/74529/alternate-surface-triangulation</link><description>I am using Microstation Select Series 2 and Geopak Corridor Modeler. My template is set up to have alternate surfaces for base course and subgrade. I know that Corridor Modeler cannot triangulate vertical surfaces, so I set the alternate surfaces to be</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Re: Alternate Surface Triangulation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/199524?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:05:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:95aa4f27-ddcf-4bc7-a3a6-81c9cfec8c03</guid><dc:creator>Paul-97</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you post your template so we can look at it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paul&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Alternate Surface Triangulation</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/199496?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:53:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:91fdc51e-7261-44d4-804e-885dce7db9c9</guid><dc:creator>neilw</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#39;t answer your question but in the meanwhile why not run a few tests by adjusting the slope and see what happens?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>