<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Prism: Incompatible subreference?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/f/geopak-inroads-mx-openroads-forum/75728/prism-incompatible-subreference</link><description>My PRISM-volume analysis stranded on a E094 Incompatible sub-reference. REPOrt shows a subreference ISOS, which AFAIK should be the correct subref for an isopachyte. Changing the subref (not with EDIT of course, not allowed, so export, hacking into the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>Re: Prism: Incompatible subreference?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/204313?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:18:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2a3382d8-0a88-47e6-b63f-f7b1fd76daeb</guid><dc:creator>RBo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot Mark, I just found out what went wrong on another forum, and was on my way here to unreport... I should have used the 911. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Prism: Incompatible subreference?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/204312?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:03:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c3138a1f-2199-4dab-b5ef-aeec88ee5bdd</guid><dc:creator>Mark Marnell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are using minor option 910, it is expecting a normal triangulation, not an isopachyte one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>