• composite deck

    waqar fazi
    waqar fazi
    Dear sir, I modeled the same canopy with two method in staad pro. In first method i am considering slab instead of composite deck. In second method i am considering composite deck. But for both cases forces in the members are different and…
    • over 3 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • STAAD Direct Analysis Method FLEX and AXIAL Parameters

    Lauren Ruchti
    Lauren Ruchti
    Which members are intended to be included in the parameters FLEX and AXIAL for a braced bay when using Direct Analysis Method? Does this include just the braced columns, beams and bracing or the entire frame (including gravity only beams/columns)? I'm…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Guy Wires and Steel Poles

    Marko
    Marko
    Hello, How do I model guy wires into my steel pole? Whenever I insert nodes to the steel pole.. The rendering of steel pole is not good. Also, did my placement of support is correct? Thank you for who will answer.. STAAD INPUT: STAAD SPACE START…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Back to back sections and member offsets

    Arthur Parala
    Arthur Parala
    Good day. I'm trying to construct and analyze a support structure in STAAD that has 2 (two) types of back to back sections and will be mounted on columns. Though my model can proceed with its analysis for the columns, it skips for the double sections…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • LATTICE GIRDER DESIGN TO EUROCODE 1991-1-3

    Mahesh Gopal
    Mahesh Gopal
    Hi all, I am assessing capacity of the signal gantry across railway tracks. This structures is basically a lattice type girder. I am designing it to Eurocode 1991-1-3. The rsult shows some of the members (top and bottom boom and a piece of column…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • RE: LATTICE GIRDER DESIGN TO EUROCODE 1991-1-3

    Mahesh Gopal
    Mahesh Gopal
    Thank you. I have encounterd a model / analysis level problem now. Kindly suggest me on this one. I have slimmed down the model now. increased few load cases. My query is if you look at axial forces for load case 2 with that of load case 5, you will…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • URGENT HELP STAAD PRO V8I SSV6 PLEASE

    MARTINS EHIS
    MARTINS EHIS
    PLS HELP I JUST DOWNLOADED STAAD PRO V8I SSV6 .....45 AND THE INTERFACE IS VERY ATTRACTIVE BUT THAT'S BY THE WAY. I SERIOUSLY WANT TO USE IT TO DESIGN AN URGENT CONCRETE JOB AND I CANT FIND BS8110 CODE NEITHER CAN I SEE EURO CODE FROM MY CURRENT DEFAULT…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • How to implement 1st-order elastic analysis with reduced stiffness specified in AISC 360-10 section C2.3 for Direct Analysis Method in STAAD. Pro?

    Gilbert Yeng
    Gilbert Yeng
    Hi, As per AISC 360-10 section C2.2b.(4) for Direct Analysis Method, both maximum 2 nd -order & 1 st -order drift shall be determined with stiffnesses adjusted as specified in Section C2.3. It seems that the command “PERFORM DIRECT ANALYSIS” is only…
    • Answered
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Simply supported Pedestrian bridge with two tube arch at both sides

    Abdalla Sharf El-Dien
    Abdalla Sharf El-Dien
    I am modeling simply supported pedestrian bridge which have 2 architectural arch at both sides. My questions are :- 1-What are the possible ways to draw arch in Staad Pro?? 2- How to make Staad Pro understand that it's not structural element but…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • View related content throughout RAM | STAAD | ADINA
  • More
  • Cancel