• why aisc 360-05 is not designing haunch members?

    waqar fazi
    waqar fazi
    Dear sir, why aisc 360-05 is not designing haunch members? file is attached.and as we are modeling portal frame in staad is it the correct way. and the coming warnings members with the same joint can be ignored. B013.std
    • over 1 year ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Getting errors in tapered design

    Khawaldah
    Khawaldah
    Hi everyone, It is very weird that I am getting different utilization factors every time I run the analysis (The software picks different forces values at the tapered element) and for some reason, all sections have the same utilization value. Could…
    • Answered
    • over 1 year ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • I am attaching a simple g+2 building which I have analysed in Staad. Have few queries about the same.

    Sidharth Reddy
    Sidharth Reddy
    I have given the clear cover to be 25mm in beams and 40mm for columns as per Indian Code. Further, I can see from the design output I can see from the design report that the clear cover is 35mm even though I have given 25mm in the input for the beams…
    • Answered
    • over 2 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Re: Staad US Std Design Code

    Jeremy Hoesly
    Jeremy Hoesly
    As a follow-up to Kris' post, a license of STAAD.Pro is always sold with a design code license. Consequently, if one of your STAAD.Pro licenses lacks an accompanying design code, then either a design code license failed to return the last time it was…
    • over 11 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • View related content throughout RAM | STAAD | ADINA
  • More
  • Cancel