• Why IS Code 800-2007 LSD fails Ratio INFINITY, while AISC 360-10 ASD passed Beam with Ratio 0.44? Taper beam

    Arun Chugh
    Arun Chugh
    1) Design check by IS Code 800-2007 LSD fails gives result of Bending Ratio = “INFINITY”, which passes with AISC 360-10 ASD Ratio 0.44! Also IS 800 code output does not give any ratio in both major, minor axis! 2) Is this 12 mm Flange thickness is critical…
    • over 1 year ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • An inclined member (Stair stringer-MC 12x10.6) passing with AISC 360-10ASD, but failing in AISC 360-16 ASD showing Cl.D1

    Janakiraman
    Janakiraman
    I am designing a Stair stringer with MC 12x10.6, keeping all parameters same, results showing as failed in AISC 360-16 ASD but passing in AISC 360-10 ASD. The failure clause D1 is same in both versions.
    • over 2 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Design of Solid slab (Conventional slabs)

    Sulaiman Ade
    Sulaiman Ade
    Hello Everyone For a while, I was using an Advanced Concrete Design (RCDC) for the design of a solid slab. Today I tried to learn the RAM concept for the slab designs but I saw a design of strips that had never seen before (When I was using RCDC and…
    • Answered
    • over 2 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • AISC Code Check

    Grayson Gilliland
    Grayson Gilliland
    Hello, I am new to STAAD and have ran into an issue when checking a model. The model was initially checking for ACI 360-10 so I went to the STAAD Editor and changed the code check command to 2016. This changed the utilization ratio drastically on most…
    • over 3 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • RAM CONNECTION- 4 vertical bolt row + EN 1993 PRYING ACTION METHOD 1 & METHOD 2

    ALEX IMMANUEL
    ALEX IMMANUEL
    could any one kindly clarifiy what are these option MEthod 1 & method 2 for prying action calculated as per EN 1993 if you can tell the reference from eurocode or any other document that would be of great help . Also if wanted to know if there…
    • over 4 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Parameters are not considered while performing tensile rupture strength as per AISC 360-10

    asif shaikh
    asif shaikh
    I was going through the staad output. In that while using WT sections, I came to know that axial tension rupture capacity is not multiplied with LRFD or ASD factors. Why is it so? For W sections its showing correct but for WT its not. abc.std
    • over 4 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Example on Direct analysis with steel design as per AISC 360-10 using STAAD.Pro

    Modestas
    Modestas
    Applies To Product(s): STAAD.Pro Version(s): ALL Environment: ALL Area: Analysis Solutions Subarea: Direct Analysis Original Author: Sye Chakraborty, Bentley Technical…
    • 5 months ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki
  • Issue on torsion checks of round HSS using AISC 360-10

    Anna
    Anna
    Hi, I am analyzing a a frame of primarily individually defined round HSS sections, sections are defined as below. When the frame is post-processed with the AISC 360-10 code Method ASD, it appears that even when the code states TORSION 0, the program…
    • over 6 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • fire protection effects

    Gilbert Fontenard
    Gilbert Fontenard
    Good day, Can STAAD pro be used to account for the additional stiffness and strength provide to steel columns from the concrete encasement (composite column sections)? I have noticed the fire protection tab in specifications and I've read in Article…
    • over 6 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • RE: Design of single angle as per IS 800 and AISC 360-10 codes in STAAD

    Sye
    Sye
    The AISC 360-10 allows single angles to be designed as per geometric axis only under certain conditions like if the angle has a continuous lateral restraint or the angle is an equal angle, bending only about one of the geometric axis with no compression…
    • over 6 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Tension members in Staad

    Gilbert Fontenard
    Gilbert Fontenard
    Good Day, I have attempted the direct analysis method on a steel structure I have to design, however I have the following queries as it relates to the effect tension only members will have on the analysis (the structure has tension rods in the form…
    • Answered
    • over 6 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • direct analysis with tension members

    Gilbert Fontenard
    Gilbert Fontenard
    Good day I have modeled a structural steel frame building and analyzed it using the direct analysis method, however I have received a few warnings and I would like to know the relevant of these as well as their potential effect on my analysis results…
    • Answered
    • over 6 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Compression capacity of an I-shaped steel section (Non Slender Flange and Non- Slender Web)

    Modestas
    Modestas
    Applies To Product(s): STAAD.Pro Version(s): All Environment: N/A Area: Design Subarea: American Design Codes Original Author: Biswatosh Purkayastha …
    • 5 months ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki
  • Direct Analysis method using AISC 360-10

    PRASHANT DALVI
    PRASHANT DALVI
    hi, I am using Staad pro v8i SS 6, version 20.07.11.70 after analysing piperack staad file, i am getting below note message in output file for every load case and load combination defined using repeat load. "** NOTE : MOMENT BALANCE DOES NOT CONSIDER…
    • Answered
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • RE: Limcon Bolt Strength

    Seth Guthrie
    Seth Guthrie
    In AISC 360-10 table J3.2, for A490X bolts, Fnv is 579 MPa. It was 520 in the 2005 edition of the manual, however. Here's a reference regarding the 2010 changes: http://msc.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/archives/2011/11/2011v11_a_comparative_look…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Torsion Design of Member # Not Possible

    Steve Crabtree
    Steve Crabtree
    Applies To Product(s): STAAD.Pro Version(s): ALL Environment: ALL Area: Design Subarea: Design for Torsion as per DG9 Original Author: Sye Chakraborty, Bentley Technical…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki
  • RE: Bent Plates in RAM Connection

    Seth Guthrie
    Seth Guthrie
    I think the situation here is that AISC 360-10, Table 10-9 is used in the case of a single plate connection only. We opted to only implement this for shear tabs since it's within that specific section of Chapter 10, but it would be a good question for…
    • over 7 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Exception[access violation]Raised! Aborting Analysis.....

    Julien Richard
    Julien Richard
    Hello, I try to run the analysis and CODE CHECK with a LOAD LIST using AISC 360-10 on a pretty big STAAD model and I receive the error message "Exception[access violation]Raised! Aborting Analysis....." I have read other post on this forum relating…
    • Answered
    • over 8 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • RAM Connection - Column Splice Moment Connection (Flange-plated) & Single Shear Plate

    Quenton Wattinger
    Quenton Wattinger
    I am designing a column splice in RAM Connection. Both columns are W10x49 A992 Gr50. Shear = 50 kips, Axial = -300 kips, M33 = 150 kip*ft. After designing the problem, I obtain results with demand values I do not know. How did RAM Connection calculate…
    • Answered
    • over 8 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • AISC 360-10 Missing Members from Code Check

    Nick Forbes
    Nick Forbes
    When carrying out a code check to AISC 360-10 using STAAD Pro V8i SS5 (20.07.10.41), the 2nd, 3rd and 4th members in my member list are consistently omitted from the code check. The member first in the list displays a UR and this also appears on the unity…
    • over 8 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Web Tapered Members - Plate wise estimate

     Sayed Saleemuddin Tanueer
    Sayed Saleemuddin Tanueer
    Dear Sir/Madam, I have designed a Frame using web tapered members in STAAD Pro. The frame weight shows the weight of different beams members used. For example, the frame is having a member whose dimensions are Web- 250 to 750 mm Web thickness…
    • Answered
    • over 8 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Member Check to AISC 360-10 and AISC Design Guide 9

    Podianko Surya
    Podianko Surya
    Hi, I have some questions regarding member check to AISC 360-10. So I was doing some check on a simple member (attached output file), and then I checked it using hand calculation to verify the numbers (I need to know how the program do simpler problem…
    • Answered
    • over 8 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • STAAD shear calculation error for AISC 360-10

    E P
    E P
    Hi All, I have noticed that STAAD incorrectly calculates the shear capacity for a member. Specifically, it uses a VERY large shear area (overstated by a factor of 2!). Here is the output for an Australian 250UC72.9: INTERMEDIATE: Aw: Cv: Kv: h/tw: Vn…
    • over 8 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • STAAD V8i series 4 (20.07.09.31) ( slenderness check)

    Vdave
    Vdave
    Hi, Currently I am using AISC 360-10, I assigned slenderness value 200 ( main 200) to members. some of the members are fail in slenderness but STAAD result shows "pass" could you please tell me why it happens ? please see attached snap below. …
    • Answered
    • over 8 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • Design of composite (Steel beam+deck slab) as per AISC, BS & Eurocode

    ArunStr
    ArunStr
    Dear bentley & friends, I had modeled the floor beams as composite and gave design parameter for Eurocode but design not performed and I had changed the code to BS and AISC, in this two codes composite design is done but not in eurocode. Why? How…
    • over 9 years ago
    • RAM | STAAD | ADINA
    • RAM | STAAD Forum
  • View related content from anywhere
  • More
  • Cancel
>